Should NHS patients be allowed to contribute extra money to their care?

British Medical Journal

Volumn 323, Issue 7312, 2001, Pages 563-565

  Richards, C ^a   Dingwall, R ^b   Watson, A ^c  

^a Nottingham Local Education Authority   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE COST; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY;

EID: 0035828447     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7312.563     Document Type: Short Survey

References (17)

1. Rationing health care
2. Cancer survival in Britain
3. How we can bring new money into cancer care
4. An ethics of clinical practice committee: Should every hospital have one?
5. An overview of allocation and rationing: Implications for geriatrics
6. Justice and the moral acceptability of rationing medical care: The Oregon experiment
7. The health care resource allocation debate
8. Rationing health care: The choice before us
9. Choices in health care: A contribution from the Netherlands
10. The Norwegian welfare state in transition: Rationing and plurality of values as ethical challenges for the health care system
11. Role of private sector in United Kingdom healthcare system
12. Treatment for impotence
13. Should women who elect to have caesarean sections pay for them?