Stort intresse för mer hälsoinformation: Större förtroende för information från vårdgivare och familj än för information på nätet, visar studie från Östergötland

Lakartidningen

Volumn 98, Issue 23, 2001, Pages 2814-2816

  Garpenby, Peter ^b   Husberg, Magnus ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSUMER; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; INFORMATION SERVICE; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SWEDEN;

CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; INFORMATION SERVICES; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRES; SWEDEN;

EID: 0035816088     PISSN: 00237205     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Patrick K, Koss S. Consumer health information «white paper». Consumer health information subgroup, Health information and application working group. Committee on applications and technology. Working draft. Washington: US Information Infrastructure Task Force, 1995.
2. Deerig MJ, Harris J. Consumer health information demand and delivery: implications for libraries. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1996; 84: 209-16.
3. Connell CM, Crawford CO. How people obtain their health information - a survey in two Pennsylvanian counties. Public Health Rep 1988; 103: 189-95.
4. Humphreys JS, Rolley F, Weinand HC. Evaluating the importance of information-sources for preventive health-care in rural Australia. Australian Journal of Public Health 1993; 17: 149-57.
5. Kassulke D, Stennerday K, Coory M, Ring I. Information-seeking behaviour and sources of health information - associations with risk factor status in an analysis of 3 Queensland electorates. Australian Journal of Public Health 1993; 17: 51-7.
6. Pennbridge J, Moya R, Rodrigues L. Questionnaire survey of California consumers' use and rating of sources of health care information including the Internet. West J Med 1999; 171: 302-5.
7. Elliott B, Elliott G. High volume medical web sites. Del Med J 2000; 72: 21-9.
8. Taylor H. Explosive growth of »cyberchondriacs« continues. The Harris poll no 44, August 11, 2000. HarrisInteractive: http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=104
9. Garpenby P, Husberg M. Hälsoinformation idag och i morgen. Östgötarnas användning av och förtroende för olika informationskällor. Linköping: Linköpings universitet. 2000. CMT Rapport 2000:3.
10. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet. JAMA 1997; 277: 1244-5.
11. Delamothe T. Quality of websites: kitemarking the west wind. Rating the quality of medical websites may be impossible. BMJ 2000; 321: 843-4.
12. Ferguson T. Online patient-helpers and physicians working together: a new partnership for high quality health care. BMJ 2000; 321: 1129-32.
13. Kiley R. Information: the key to restoring trust. He@lth Information on the Internet 2000; 3: 1-2: http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/en/1/homlibinfacthiiarc17.html