Evidence-based obstetrics in Australia: Can we put away the wooden spoon?

Medical Journal of Australia

Volumn 174, Issue 11, 2001, Pages 588-589

  Searle, J ^a  

^a PENINSULA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORTICOSTEROID;

AUSTRALIA; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DRUG USE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; INFANT; INFORMATION SERVICE; LEGAL LIABILITY; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NEONATAL RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; OBSTETRICS; PATIENT CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREMATURITY; REVIEW;

EID: 0035806043     PISSN: 0025729X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143445.x     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. 1931-1971: A critical review, with particular reference to the medical profession
2. Conceptual issues in research synthesis
3. Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research
4. Promoting pulmonary maturity
5. What is happening to caesarean section rates?
6. Neonatal pediatrics at the century mark
7. Rates for obstetric intervention among private and public patients in Australia: Population based descriptive study
8. The Cochrane Library
9. Systematic reviews of medical evidence: The use of meta-analysis in obstetrics and gynaecology
10. Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term
11. Induction of labour for suspected fetal macrosomia
12. Uptake of meta-analytical overviews of effective care in English obstetric units
13. Physicians' attitudes toward evidence based obstetric practice: A questionnaire survey
14. Use of systematic reviews of randomised trials by Australian neonatologists and obstetricians
15. Theory into practice: Applying the evidence across the health service
16. Opinion leaders vs audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines. Delivery after previous cesarean section
17. Implementing findings of research
18. No magic bullets: A systematic review of 102 trials of intervention to help health care professionals deliver services more effectively or efficiently
19. General practitioners' use of evidence databases
20. Seven alternatives to evidence based medicine