What is evidence-based medicine?;Hvad er evidensbaseret medicin?

Ugeskrift for Laeger

Volumn 163, Issue 27, 2001, Pages 3769-3772

  Pedersen, Tom ^a   Gluud, Christian N ^a   Gøtzsche, Peter C ^a   Matzen, Peter ^a   Wille Jørgensen, Peer A ^a  

^a BISPEBJERG HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FACTUAL DATABASE; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESEARCH; REVIEW;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; DATABASES, FACTUAL; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RESEARCH;

EID: 0035797237     PISSN: 00415782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996; 312: 71-2.
2. Wulff HR, Gøtzsche PC. Rationel klinik: evidensbaserede diagnostiske og terapeutiske beslutninger, 4. udg. København: Munksgaard, 1997.
3. Gøtzsche PC, Liberati A, Luca P, Torri V. Beware of surrogate outcome measures. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1996; 12: 238-46.
4. Gluud C. Trials and errors in clinical research. Lancet 1999; 354 (suppl 4): 59.
5. Hróbjartsson A, Gøtzsche PC, Gluud C. The controlled clinical trial turns 100 years: Fibiger's trial of serum treatment of diphtheria. BMJ 1998; 317: 1243-5.
6. Cochrane A. Effectiveness and efficiency. Random reflections on health services. London: Nuffield Provicial Hospitals Trust, 1972.
7. Matzen P. Fra lærebog til internet. Ugeskr Læger 2000; 162: 76-7.
8. Weed LL. New connections between medical knowledge and patient care. BMJ 1997; 315: 231-5.
9. Antman EM, Lau J, Kupelnick B, Mosteller F, Chalmers TC. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatment for myocardial infarction. JAMA 1992; 268: 240-8.
10. Pagliaro L, D'Amico G, Pasta L, Tiné F, Aragona E, Politi F, et al. Efficacy and efficiency of treatments in portal hypertension. I: de Franchis R, ed. Portal Hypertension II. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd, 1996: 159-79.
11. Mulrow CD. The medical review article: state of the science. Ann Intern Med 1987; 106: 485-8.
12. Shaneyfelt TM, Mayo-Smith MF, Rothwangl J. Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature. JAMA 1999; 281: 1950-1.
13. Bradshaw BG, Liu SS, Thirby RC. Standardized perioperative care protocols and reduced lenght of stay after colon surgery. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186: 501-8.
14. Schultz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empiral evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995; 273: 408-12.
15. Moher D, Pham B, Jones A et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 1998; 352: 609-13.
16. Kjærgaard LL, Villumsen J, Gluud C. Quality of randomised clinical trials affects estimates of intervention efficacy. VII Cochrane Colloquium, Rome 1999; B10: 57.
17. Sacks H, Chalmers TC, Smith H. Randomized versus historical controls for clinical trials. Am J Med 1982; 72: 233-40.
18. Berlin JA, Begg CB, Louis TA. An assessment of publication bias using a sample of published clinical trials. J Am Stat Assoc 1989; 84: 381-92.
19. McKee M, Britton A, Black N, McPherson K, Sanderson C, Bain C. Choose in between randomised and non-randomised studies. I: Black N, Brazier J, Fitzpatrick, Reeves B, eds. Health Services Research Methods. London: BMJ books 1998: 61-72.
20. Reeves BC, Machlehose RR, Harvey IM, Sheldon TA, Russel IT, Black AMS. Comparisons of effect derived from randomised and non-randomised studies. I: Black N, Brazier J, Fitzpatrick, Reeves B, eds. Health services research methods. London: BMJ books, 1998: 73-85.
21. Solomon MJ, McLeod RS. Should we be performing more randomized controlled trials evaluating surgical operations? Surgery 1995; 118: 459-67.
22. Russell I. Evaluating new surgical procedures. BMJ 1995; 311: 1243-4.
23. Wolf AM, Nasser JF, Wolf AM, Schorling JB. The impact of informed consent on patient interest in prostate-specific antigen screening. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 1333-6.
24. Lele S, Radsone D, Eremin J, Kendal R, Hosie KB. Prospectic audit following the introduction of short-course preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 97-9.
25. Gøtzsche PC, Olsen O. Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? Lancet 2000; 355: 131-6.
26. Matzen P. Evidensbaseret medicin. I: Lorenzen I, Bendixen G, Hansen NE, red. Medicinsk kompendium. København: Nyt Nordisk Forlag, 1999: 12-23.
27. Eccles M, Freemantle N, Mason J. North of England evidence based guidelines development project methods of developing guidelines for efficient drug use in primary care. BMJ 1998; 316: 1232-5.
28. McAlister FA, Clark HD, van Walraven C, Straus SE, Lawson FM, Moher D et al. The medical review article revisited: has the science improved? Ann Intern Med 1999; 131: 947-51.
29. Sackett D, Straus SE, Richardson WS, Rosenberg WM, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2000.
30. Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: the basics of evidence based medicine. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 1997.