Doctors are increasingly held liable for failing to detect cancer during mass screening;Artsen steeds vaker aansprakelijk gesteld voor het missen van kanker bij bevolkingsonderzoek

Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

Volumn 145, Issue 22, 2001, Pages 1074-1078

  Giard, R W M ^a  

^a Medisch Centrum Rijnmond Zuid   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; ERROR; EXPECTATION; EXPERT WITNESS; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; LAW SUIT; MEDICAL LIABILITY; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PATHOLOGIST; RADIOLOGIST; REVIEW; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; EXPERT TESTIMONY; HUMANS; LIABILITY, LEGAL; MALPRACTICE; MASS SCREENING; NEOPLASMS; NETHERLANDS; PATHOLOGY; RADIOLOGY;

EID: 0035795939     PISSN: 00282162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Screening for breast and cervical cancer as a common cause for litigation. A false negative result may be one of an irreducible minimum of errors
2. Double jeopardy for women in cervical screening
3. Postmodern medicine
4. US women's attitudes to false positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: Cross sectional survey
5. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations
6. Aansprakelijkheidsrecht
7. Nederlands vermogensrecht. Leidraad voor het nieuwe BW
8. Clinical epidemiology, the essentials
9. Evaluation of the effect of breast cancer screening by record linkage with the cancer registry, the Netherlands
10. Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms
11. Cervixuitstrijkje ongeschikt voor het uitsluiten van cervixcarcinoom