A predicate-based approach to defining visual language syntax

2001 IEEE Symposium on Human-Centric Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 40-47

  Janneck, Jörn W ^a   Esser, Robert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; ERROR ANALYSIS; SEMANTICS; SYNTACTICS;

VISUAL LANGUAGE SYNTAXES;

COMPUTER SCIENCE;

EID: 0035791297     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. The Moses Project. Computer Engineering and Communications Laboratory, ETH Zurich (http://www.tik.ee.ethz.ch/̃moses).
2. R. Bardohl, G. Taentzer, M. Minas, and A. Schürr. Application of graph transformation to visual languages. In Handbook on Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformation, Volume 2: Applications, Languages and Tools. World Scientific, 1999.
3. Wilfried Brauer, Robert Gold, and Walter Vogler. A survey of behaviour and equivalence preserving refinements of petri nets. In Rozenberg, G., editor, Advances in Petri Nets 1990, volume 483 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 1-46, Berlin, Germany, 1991. Springer-Verlag.
4. S. Chok and Kim Marriott. Parsing visual languages. In Proceedings of 18th Australasian Computer Science Conference, 1995.
5. Martin Erwig. Abstract visual syntax. In 1997 International Workshop on Theory of Visual Languages, pages 15-25, 1997.
6. Robert Esser. An Object Oriented Petri Net Approach to Embedded System Design. PhD thesis, ETH Zurich, 1996.
7. Robert Esser and Jörn W. Janneck. Moses - a tool suite for visual modeling of discrete-event systems. In Symposium on Visual/Multimedia Approaches to Programming and Software Engineering, HCC'01, 2001.
8. J.M. Gooday and A.G. Cohn. Using spatial logic to describe visual languages. In Proc. International Workshop on Theory of Visual Languages, Gubbio, Italy, 1996.
9. R. Helm and Kim Marriott. A declarative specification and semantics for visual languages. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 2:311-331, 1991.
10. Manuel Hilty. Graphical definition of visual syntax. Term project report, Computer Engineering and Networks Lab, ETH Zurich, 2000.
11. Honeywell, Inc. Dome Guide, Version 5.2.2, 2000.
12. Institute for Software Integrated Systems, Vanderbilt University. GME User's Manual, Version 1.0, March 2000.
13. Jörn W. Janneck. Graph-type definition language (GTDL)-specification. Technical report, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory, ETH Zurich, 2000.
14. Jörn W. Janneck. Syntax and Semantics of Graphs-An approach to the specification of visual notations for discrete event systems. PhD thesis, ETH Zurich, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory, July 2000.
15. B. Meyer K. Marriott and K. Wittenburg. A survey of visual language specification and recognition. In Marriott, K. and Meyer, B.(Eds), Visual Language Theory, Springer-Verlag, 1998.
16. Mark Minas. Diagram editing with hypergraph parser support. In Proc. 13th IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, pages 230-237. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1997.
17. J. Rekers and A. Schürr. A graph grammar approach to graphical parsing. In Proc. 11th IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, pages 195-202, 1995.
18. J. Rekers and Andreas Schürr. Defining and parsing visual languages with layered graph grammars. JVLC, 8(1):27-55, 1997.
19. A. Schürr. PROGRES: A VHL-language based on graph grammars. In in Proc. 4th Int. Workshop on Graph-Grammars and Their Application to Computer Science, number 532 in LNCS, pages 641-659. Springer-Verlag, 1991.
20. G. Taentzer, C. Ermel, and M. Rudolf. The AGG approach: Language and tool environment. In Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformation, Volume 2: Applications, Languages and Tools. World Scientific, 1999.