Evaluating the value-added benefits of using requirements reuse metrics in ERP projects

Proceedings of SSR'01 2001 Symposium on Software Reusability

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 155-163

  Daneva, Maya ^a  

^a Clearnet Communications Inc   (Canada)

Author keywords

Benefits Assessment; ERP; Requirements Reuse Measurement; Reuse driven Requirements Engineering

Indexed keywords

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING; INVESTMENTS; QUALITY ASSURANCE; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING;

BENEFITS ASSESSMENT;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY;

EID: 0035790654     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/375212.375283     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Benesh, M., Managing your ERP project. Software Testing and Quality Engineering, (July/August), 38-43.
2. Cisco Systems Inc.: Implementing ERP, Harvard Business School Publishing, Report 9-699-022, 20. Oct. 1998.
3. nd edition, New York, 2000.
4. Daneva M.: Mesuring reuse of SAP requirements: a model-based approach, Proceedings of SSR'99 (Los Angeles CA, May 1999), ACM Press,
5. Daneva, M., Reuse measurement in the ERP requirements engineering process, Proceedings of ICSR'00 (Vienna Austria, July 2000), Springer.
6. Daneva, M., Practical reuse measurement in ERP requirements engineering, Proceedings of CaiSE'00 (Stockholm Sweden, June 2000), Springer, 309-324.
7. El Emam, K., and Birk, A. Validating the ISO/IEC 15504 measure of software requirements analysis process capability. IEEE Transactions on SE, Vol. 26-6, 2000.
8. El Emam, K., and Briand, L. Costs and benefits of software process improvement. In: Better Software Practice for Business Benefits: Principles and Experience, R. Messnarz and T. Tully, eds., IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos, 1999.
9. El Emam, K., and Madhavji, N.H. Measuring the success of requirements engineering process. Proceedings of ISRE'95 (Limerick Ireland, May 1995) ACM Press, 204-211.
10. El Emam, K., Quintin, S., and Madhavji, N.H. User participation in the requirements engineering process: an empirical study, Requirements Engineering Journal 1, 1996, 4-26.
11. Fenton, N., and Nell, M. Software metrics: roadmap, Proceedings of ICSE00 (Limerick Ireland, May 2000) ACM Press, 2000.
12. Goldenson, D., El Emam, K., Herbsleb, J. and Deephouse, C. Empirical studies of software process assessment methods. In: Elements of Sofware Process Assessment and Improvement, K. E1 Emam and N.H. Madhavji, eds. IEEE CS Press, 1999.
13. Goodman, P., and Morris, P. Forgotten aspects of function point analysis, Proceedings of IFPUG'99 (Orlando FL, October 1999) IFPUG.
14. Jones, C.: Applied Software Measurement, McGraw Hill, New York, 1996
15. Keller; G., and Teufel, T.: SAP R/3 Process Oriented Implementation, Addison-Wesley Longman, Harlow, 1998.
16. Krasner H., Ensuring e-business success by learning from ERP Failures, IEEE IT Pro, (January/February, 2000), 22-27.
17. Longstreet D., Using Function Points, Longstreet Consulting, http://www.softwaremetrics.com/Articles/using.htm
18. Phillips, J., The Consultant's Scorecard, McGraw Hill, New York, 2000.
19. PROSES Consortium, Profes.Manual, Fraunhofer IRB-Verlag, Stuttgart, 2000.
20. Sommerville, I., P. Sawyer, Requirements Engineering: Best Practice Guide, Willey, London, 1997.
21. Statz, J., Leverage your lessons, IEEE Software, March/April, 1999, 30-33.
22. Thorp J., The Information Paradox: Realizing the Business Benefits of Information technology, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1999.