The longitudinal matching of current population surveys: A proposed algorithm

Journal of Economic and Social Measurement

Volumn 27, Issue 1-2, 2001, Pages 71-91

  Feng, Shuaizhang ^a  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; DATA INTERPRETATION; DEMOGRAPHIC SURVEY;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0035786652     PISSN: 07479662     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/jem-2003-0197     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. L. Goldberg, J. Tracy and S. Aaronson, Exchange Rates and Employment Instability: Evidence from Matched CPS data, American Economic Review 89(2) (May 1999), 204-210.
2. B.T. Hirsch and E.J. Schumacher, Unions, Wages, and Skills, Journal of Human Resources 33(1) (Winter 1998), 201-219.
3. D.A. Jaeger, Reconciling the Old and New Census Bureau Education Questions: Recommendations for Researchers, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 15(3) (July 1997), 300-309.
4. D.A. Jaeger, M.E. Page, Degrees Matter: New Evidence on Sheepskin Effects in the Returns to Education, Review of Economics and Statistics 78(4) (November 1996), 733-740.
5. A. Katz, K. Teuter and P. Sidel, Comparison of Alternative Ways of Deriving Panel Data from the Annual Demographic Files of the Current Population Survey, Review of Public Data Use 12(1) (March 1984), 35-44.
6. B.C. Madrian and L.J. Lefgren, An approach to longitudinally matching Current Population Survey (CPS) respondents, Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 26 (2000), 31-62.
7. F. Peracchi and F. Welch, How Representative are Matched Cross-sections? Evidence from the Current Population Survey, Journal of Econometrics 68 (1995), 153-179.
8. A. Pitts, Matching Adjacent Years of the Current Population Survey, UCLA Labor Economics Workshop, 1985.
9. F. Welch, Matching the Current Population Survey, Stata Technical Bulletin 12 (1993), 7-11.