Biocompatibility studies of modified collagen/hyaluronan membranes after implantation

Cell and Tissue Banking

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 135-142

  Koller, J ^a   Bakos D ^b   Sadlonova I ^c  

^a Ruzinov General Hospital   (Slovakia)

^b SLOVAK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Slovakia)

^c Drug Research Institute   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

Animal study; Biocompatibility; Collagen sodium hyaluronan menbrane; Dermal substitute; Implantation

Indexed keywords

ATELOCOLLAGEN; BIOMATERIAL; HEXAMETHYLENE DIISOCYANATE; HYALURONIC ACID; MACROGOL;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS LINKING; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HOST; MALE; MICROSCOPY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SKIN TRANSPLANTATION; TISSUE GROWTH;

EID: 0035760437     PISSN: 13899333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1020183322002     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bakoš D. and Koniarová D. 1999. Bioengineering of skin substitute. Chem. Papers 53: 431-435.
2. Bakoš D., Jorge-Herrero E. and Koller J. 2000. Resorption and calcification of chemically modified collagen/hyaluronan hybrid membranes. Polymers in Medicine 30: 57-64.
3. Balasubramani M., Kumar T.R. and Babu M. 2001. Skin substitutes: a review. Burns 27: 534-544.
4. Hansbrough J.F., Morgan J. and Greenleaf B.S. 1994. Development of a temporary living skin replacement composed of human neonatal fibroblasts cultured in Biobrane, a synthetic dressing material. Surger 115: 633-644.
5. Herndon D.N. 1997. Perspectives in the use of allograft. J. of Burn Care & Rehabilitation 18: S6-S9.
6. ISO 1093 - 6 1994. Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 6:. Tests for local effects after implantation.
7. Koller J., Bakoš D. and Sadloňová I. 2000. Biocompatibility studies of a new biosynthetic dermal substitute based on collagen/hyaluronan conjugate. Cell and Tissue Banking 1: 75-80.
8. Pruitt B.A. and Levine N.S. 1984. Characteristics and uses of biologic dressings and skin substitutes. Arch. Surg. 119: 311-322.
9. Shakespeare P. 2001. Burn wound healing and skin substitutes. Burns 27: 517-522.
10. Shrivastava S., Gorham S.D., French D.A., Shivas A.A. and Courtney J.M. 1990. In vivo evaluation and comparison of collagen, acetylated collagen and collagen/glycosaminoglycan composite films and sponges as candidate biomaterials. Biomaterials 11: 155-162.
11. Spielvogel R.L. 1997. A histologic study of Dermagraft TC in patients' burn wounds. J Burn Care & Rehabilitation 18: 16S.
12. Thomas S. 1990. Semipermeable film dressings. In: Wound management and dressings. The Pharmaceutical Press, London, pp. 25-34.
13. Vizárová K., Reháková M., Bakoš D. and Vaňo I. 1993. Biomateriály na báze kolagénu. Bratislavské lekárske listy 94: 635-638.
14. Vizárová K., Bakoš D., Reháková M., Petríková M., Panáková E. and Koller J. 1995. The Modification of Layered Atelocollagen: Enzymatic Degradation and cytotoxicity Evaluation. Biomaterials 16: 1217-1221.
15. Yannas I.V. and Burke J.F. 1980. Design of artificial skin I. Basic design principles. J. Biomed. Mat. Res 14: 65-81.