Radiopacity of esthetic restorative materials compared with human tooth structure

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 383-386

  Hara, Anderson Takeo ^b   Serra, Mônica Campos ^a   Haiter Neto, Francisco ^b   Rodrigues Jr , Antonio Luiz ^b  

^a Faculdade Odontol Ribeirao P   (Brazil)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOMER; CONTRAST MEDIUM; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; HUMAN; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RADIODENSITOMETRY; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0035757581     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. The desirability of using radiopaque plastics in dentistry: A status report. J Am Dent Assoc 1981; 102: 347-349.
2. Akerboom HBM, Kreltlen CM, van Amerongen WE, et al. Radiopacity of posterior composite resins, composite resin luting cements, and glass-ionomer lining cements. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 70: 351-355.
3. Marouf N, Sidhu SK. A study on the radiopacity of different shades of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials. Oper Dent 1998; 23: 10-14.
4. de Abreu MJ, Tavares D, Vieira DF. Radiopacity of restorative materials Oper Dent 1977; 2: 3-16.
5. Tamburus JR. Radiopacidade de resinas compostas. Rev Odont USP 1990; 4: 103-107.
6. Willems G, Noack MJ, Inokochi S, et al. Radiopacity of composites compared with human enamel and dentine. J Dent 1991;19: 362-365.
7. Sidhu SK, Shah PMM, Chong BS, et al. Radiopacity of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative cements. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 639-643.
8. Smith DC. Composition and characteristics of glass-ionomer cements. J Am Dent Assoc 1990; 120: 20-22.
9. Wilson AD, McLean JW. Glass-ionomer Cements. Chicago: Quintessence Books, 1988.
10. nd International Symposium on Glass Ionomers, Philadelphia, PA: International Symposia in Dentistry, PC, 1994; 61-73.
11. nd International Symposium on Glass Ionomers, Philadelphia, PA: International Symposia in Dentistry, PC, 1994; 13-22.
12. Nicholson JW, McLean JW. A preliminary report on the effect of storage in water on the properties of commercial light-cured glass-ionomer cements. Br Dent J 1992; 173: 98-101.
13. Gladys S, van Meerbeek B, Braem M, et al. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 883-894.
14. Christensen GJ. Glass-ionomer resin: A maturing concept. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124: 248-249.
15. Serra MC, Cury JA. The in vitro effect of glass-ionomer cement restoration on enamel subjected to a demineralization and remineralization model. Quintessence Int 1992; 23: 143-147.
16. Pereira PNR, Inokoshi S, Tagami J. In vitro caries inhibition around fluoride releasing materials. J Dent 1998; 26: 505-510.
17. Christensen GJ. Restoration of pediatric posterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127: 106-108.
18. nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1957; 611.
19. th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1997; 704.
20. st ed. São Paulo :FEALQ, 1984; 292.
21. rd ed. FUNEP, Jaboticabal, 1995; 247.
22. Burgess J, Norling B, Summitt. Resin ionomer restorative materials. The new generation. J Esthet Dent 1994; 6: 207-215.
23. Bouschlicher MR, Cobb DS, Boyer DB. Radiopacity of compomers, flowable and conventional resin composites for posterior restorations. Oper Dent 1999; 24: 20-25.
24. Espelid I, Tveit AB, Erickson RL et al. Radiopacity of restorations and detection of secondary caries. Dent Mater 1991; 7: 114-117.
25. Sidhu SK, Sherrif M, Watson TF. Failure of resin-modified glass-ionomers subjected to shear loading. J Dent 1999; 27: 373-381.
26. Kidd EAM, Toffenetti F, Mjör IA. Secondary caries. Int Dent J 1992; 42: 127-138.
27. Featherstone JDB. Fluoride, remineralization and root caries. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 271-274.
28. Welbury RR, Walls AW, Murray JJ, et al. The 5-year results of a clinical trial comparting a glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement restoration with an amalgam restoration. Br Dent J 1991; 170: 177-181.
29. Lumley PJ, Fisher FJ. Tunnel restorations: A long-term pilot study over a minimum of five years. J Dent 1995; 23: 213-215.
30. Gladys S, van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, et al. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions. Dent Mat 1998; 14: 294-306.
31. Skartveit L, Halse A. Radiopacity of glass ionomer materials. J Oral Rehabil 1996; 23: 1-4.
32. Williams JA, Billington RW. The radiopacity of glass ionomer dental materials. J Oral Rehabil 1990; 17: 245-248.
33. Dirks OB. Post eruptive changes in dental enamel. J Dent Res 1966; 45: 503-511.
34. Williams JA, Billington RW. A new technique for measuring the radiopacity of natural substance and restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 1987; 14: 267-269.
35. Stanford CM, Fan PL, Schoenfeld CM. Radiopacity of light-cured posterior composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1987; 115: 722-724.