Comparison of the femostop device and manual pressure in reducing groin puncture site complications following coronary angioplasty and coronary stent placement

International Journal of Nursing Practice

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 366-375

  Walker, Sandra Beverley ^a   Cleary, Sonja ^a   Higgins, Monica ^b  

^a CENTRAL QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b St Andrews War Memorial Hospital   (Australia)

Author keywords

Coronary angioplasty; Femoral sheath removal; Haemostasis; Manual compression

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY ATHEROSCLEROSIS; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; INGUINAL REGION; INSTRUMENTATION; NURSING CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STENT;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; FEMORAL ARTERY; GROIN; HEMOSTASIS; HUMANS; NURSING CARE; STENTS;

EID: 0035752656     PISSN: 13227114     EISSN: 1440172X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-172X.2001.00291.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Peet G, McGrath M, Bunt J, Hilton J. Femoral arterial sheath removal after PTCA: A cross Canada survey. Canadian Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 1995; 6: 13-19.
2. Higgins M. Performance indicators and standards of care for coronary angioplasty procedures: a quality initiative. International Journal of Nursing Practice 1998; 4: 261-266.
3. Davis C, VanRiper S, Jongstreet J, Moscucc M. Vascular complications of coronary interventions. Heart and Lung-the Journal of Acute and Critical Care 1997; 26: 118-127.
4. Schickel S, Cronin S, Mize A,Voelker C. Removal of femoral sheaths by registered nurses: Issues and outcomes. Critical Care Nurse 1996; 16: 32-36.
5. Barbiere C.A new device for control of bleeding after transfemoral catheterisation. Critical Care Nurse 1995; 1: 51-53.
6. The Prince Charles Hospital Physiotherapy Department Report on angioplasty nursing practice. Brisbane,Australia: The Prince Charles Hospital, 1997.
7. Kern L. Ask the experts. Critical Care Nurse 1992; 3: 76. 8 Gawlinski A. Ask the experts. Critical Care Nurse 1995; 4: 82-83.
8. Gawlinski A. Ask the experts. Critical Care Nurse 1995; 4: 82-83.
9. National Heart Foundation. Coronary angioplasty report no. 9. Canberra: National Heart Foundation, 1995b.
10. Bevans M, McLinmore E. Intracoronary stents: A new approach to coronary artery dilatation. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 1992; 7: 34-49.
11. Serruys P, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F et al. A comparison of balloon expandable stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. New England Journal of Medicine 1994; 331: 489-495.
12. Fischman D, Leon M, Baim D et al. A randomised comparison of coronary stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. New England Journal of Medicine 1994; 331: 496-501.
13. Muller D, Shamir K, Erllis S. Peripheral vascular complications after conventional and complex percutaneous interventionalist procedures. American Journal of Cardiology 1992; 69: 63-68.
14. Spokoiny A, Sanborn T. Management of the arterial puncture site. Journal of Interventionalist Cardiology 1994; 7: 187-193.
15. Gibson C.A comparison of compression devices for femoral artery haemostasis (Dissertation). Spokane,W.A.: Gonzaga University, 1996.
16. Bogart M. Time to haemostasis: A comparison of manual versus mechanical compression to the femoral artery. American Journal of Critical Care 1995; 4:149-156.
17. Homuth G. Relationship of methods for removal of femoral sheaths to the incidence of haematomas and patient comfort (Dissertation). Dekalb, Illinois: Northern Illinios University, 1990.
18. Semler H. Transfemoral catheterization: Mechanical versus manual control of bleeding. Radiology 1985; 154: 234- 235.
19. Simon A. Use of a mechanical device for hemostasis following cardiac catheterisation. America Journal of Critical Care 1994; 3: 62-64.
20. Rudisill P,Williams LB, Craig S, Schopp P. Study of mechanical versus manual pressure following various interventional cardiology procedures. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 1997; 11: 15-22.
21. Lazzara D, Pfersdorf P, Sedlacek M. Femoral compression device: a pressing way to prevent bleeding. Nursing 1997; 27: 54-57.
22. Nordrehaug J, Nicolas A, Chronos J et al. Randomised evaluation of a new inflatable femoral artery compression device after coronary angiography. Conference presentation. Texas: American Heart Association, 1992.
23. Beres R, Nemcek A, Vogelzang R. Puncture site haemostasis: clinical evaluation of a new compression devise. Conference presentation. La Jolla, California: American Roetgen Ray Society Meeting, 1993.
24. Sridhar K, Porter D, Gupta B et al. Reduction in peripheral vascular complications after coronary angioplasty by the use of a pneumatic vascular compression device. Circulation 1994; 90: 1-621.
25. Petula S, Hudacek S. The FemoStop™ device: utilization guidelines for the critical care nurse. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing 1995; 14: 259-264.
26. Shaffer R, Ruiz A.Assessing complications of PTCA. Nursing 1992; October: 41-46.
27. Popma J, Lowell F.Vascular complications after balloon and new device angioplasty. Circulation 1993; 88: 1569-1578.
28. The Prince Charles Hospital and Health District Service, Queensland Health.Angioplasty Nursing Service Record of Care Records. Brisbane,Australia:The Prince Charles Hospital and Health District Service Queensland, 1995-1996.
29. Bucher L, Melander S. Critical Care Nursing. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1999.
30. Schlesselman J. Case-Control Studies.New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.
31. Armitage G, Berry G. Statistical Method in Medical Research. London: Blackwell Science, 1987.
32. Norusis M. SPSS/PC+. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1990.
33. Beattie S. Cut the risks for cardiac cath patients. RN 1999; 62: 50-55.