Prejudice against "unbalanced" families

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 34-36

  Ruddick, William ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ETHICS; FAMILY SIZE; FEMALE; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; HOMOSEXUALITY; HUMAN; MALE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SELECTION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; SOCIAL CONTROL; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;

ETHICS; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; HOMOSEXUALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT SELECTION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PREJUDICE; SEX PRESELECTION; SINGLE PERSON; SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;

EID: 0035751487     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/152651601750079014     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. Mahowald, M. B. 2001. Reverse sexism? Not to worry. American Journal of Bioethics, 1(1):15-16.
2. Robertson, J. A. 1994. Children of choice: Freedom and the new reproductive technologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
3. Ruddick, W. 1997. Do doctors under treat pain? Bioethics 11:3/4.
4. Ruddick, W. 1999a. Hope and deception. Bioethics 13:3/4.
5. Ruddick, W. 1999b. Parenthood: three concepts and a principle. In Morals, marriage, and parenthood, ed. L. Houlgate. Washington: Wadsworth.
6. Ruddick, W. n.d. Ways to limit prenatal testing. In Prenatal testing and disability, ed. E. Parens and A. Asch. Washington: Georgetown University Press, forthcoming.