Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 475-485

  Hagopian, Louis P ^a   Rush, Karena S ^b   Lewin, Adam B ^b   Long, Ethan S ^b  

^a KENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Preference assessment; Reinforcer assessment; Stimulus engagement

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REINFORCEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIOPATHY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CHILD; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR DISORDERS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0035749105     PISSN: 00218855     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-475     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519-533.
2. DeLeon, I. G., Iwata, B. A., Conners, J., & Wallace, M. D. (1999). Examination of ambiguous stimulus preferences with duration-based measures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 111-114.
3. DeLeon, I. G., Iwata, B. A., & Roscoe, E. M. (1997). Displacement of leisure reinforcers by food during preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 475-484.
4. Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., & Amari, A. (1996). Integrating caregiver report with a systematic choice assessment. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 101, 15-25.
5. Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491-498.
6. Pace, G. M., Ivancic, M. T., Edwards, G. L., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1985). Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 249-255.
7. Piazza, C. C., Fisher, W. W., Hagopian, L. P., Bowman, L. G., & Toole, L. (1996). Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 1-9.
8. Ringdahl, J. E., Vollmer, T. R., Marcus, B. A., & Roane, H. S. (1997). An analogue evaluation of environmental enrichment: The role of stimulus preference. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 203-216.
9. Roane, H. S., Vollmer, T. R., Ringdahl, J. E., & Marcus, B. A. (1998). Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 605-620.