Perceptual changes in the anterior maxilla after placement of endosseous implants

Clinical implant dentistry and related research

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 148-155

  Jacobs, Reinhilde ^b   Wu, Chen Han ^a   Goossens, Kitty ^a   Van Loven, Karen ^a   van Steenberghe, Daniel ^a,c  

^a DEPARTMENT OF IMAGING AND PATHOLOGY   (Belgium)

^b RESEARCH FOUNDATION FLANDERS FWO   (Belgium)

^c P I Branemark chair in osseointegration   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; JAW; MALE; MAXILLA; MECHANICAL STRESS; MIDDLE AGED; MOUTH MUCOSA; PHYSIOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STATISTICS; TOOTH; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOUCH; VIBRATION;

ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE, COMPLETE; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MALE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; MOUTH MUCOSA; OSSEOINTEGRATION; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; STATISTICS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOOTH; TOUCH; VIBRATION;

EID: 0035748991     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00135.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. 1 Byers MR, Dong WK. Comparison of trigeminal receptor location and structure in the periodontal ligament of different types of teeth from the rat, cat, and monkey. J Comp Neurol 1989 ; 279: 117–127.
2. 2 Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Comparison between teeth and implant‐supported prostheses regarding the passive threshold. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993 ; 8: 549–554.
3. 3 Jacobs R. Neurological versus psychophysical assessment of osseoperception. In: Jacobs R, ed. Osseoperception. Leuven: Department of Periodontology, Catholic University of Leuven, 1998: 75–88.
4. 4 Brånemark P‐I. Osseointegration: biotechnological perspective and clinical modality. In: Brånemark P‐I, Rydevik BL, Skalak R, eds. Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and joint replacement. Chicago: Quintessence, 1997: 1–24.
5. 5 Linden RW, Scott BJ. The effect of tooth extraction on periodontal ligament mechanoreceptors represented in the mesencephalic nucleus of the cat. Arch Oral Biol 1989 ; 34: 937–941.
6. 6 Wang Y‐H, Kojo T, Ando H, et al. Nerve regeneration after implantation in peri‐implant area. A histological study on different implant materials in dogs. In: Jacobs R, ed. Osseoperception. Leuven: Department of Periodontology, Catholic University of Leuven, 1998: 3–11.
7. 7 Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Comparative evaluation of the oral tactile function by means of teeth or implant‐supported prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991 ; 2: 75–80.
8. 8 Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Quantitative evaluation of the masseteric postStimulus EMG complex following mechanical or acoustic stimulation of osseointegrated oral implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995 ; 10: 175–182.
9. 9 Jacobs R, Schotte A, van Steenberghe D. Influence of temperature and foil hardness on interocclusal tactile threshold. J Periodont Res 1992 ; 27: 581–587.
10. 10 Jacobs R, Bou Serhal C, van Steenberghe D. The stereognos‐tic ability of natural dentitions versus implant‐supported fixed prostheses or overdentures. Clin Oral Invest 1997 ; 1: 89–94.
11. 11 Jacobs R, Bou Serhal C, van Steenberghe D. Oral stereogno‐sis: a review of the literature. Clin Oral Invest 1998 ; 2: 3–10.
12. 12 Jacobs R, Brånemark R, Olmarker K, Rydevik B, van Steenberghe D, Brånemark P‐I. Physiological detection thresholds for vibrotactile and pressure stimulation of prosthetic limbs using bone‐anchored or soft tissue support. In: Jacobs R, ed. Osseoperception. Leuven: Department of Periodontology, Catholic University of Leuven, 1998: 125–142.
13. 13 Keller D, Hämmerle CH, Lang NP. Thresholds for tactile sensitivity perceived with dental implants remain unchanged during a healing phase of 3 months. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996 ; 7: 48–54.
14. 14 Lundqvist S, Haraldson T. Oral function in patients wearing fixed prosthesis on osseointegrated implants in the maxilla: 3‐year follow‐up study. Scand J Dent Res 1992 ; 100: 279–283.
15. 15 Mericske‐Stera R, Assal P, Mericske E, Bürgin W. Occlusal force and oral tactile sensibility measured in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995 ; 10: 345–354.
16. 16 Jacobs R, Wu C‐H, Van Loven K, Desnyder M, Kolenaar B, van Steenberghe. Methodology of sensory tests. J Oral Rehabil 2001. (In press).
17. 17 Stenfelt S, Jacobs R, Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Brånemark P‐I. A technique for determination of vibrotactile force threshold levels in patients with orthopaedic osseointegrated implants. In: Jacobs R, ed. Osseoperception. Leuven: Department of Periodontology, Catholic University of Leuven, 1998: 105–123.
18. 18 Braune S, Schady W. Changes in sensation after nerve injury or amputation: the role of central factors. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993 ; 56: 393–399.
19. 19 Lundborg G, Lie‐Stenström AK, Sollerman C, Strömberg T, Pyykkö I. Digital vibrogram: a new diagnostic tool for sensory testing in compression neuropathy. J Hand Surg [Am] 1986 ; 11: 693–699.
20. 20 Lundborg G, Sollerman C, Strömberg T, Pyykkö I, Rosén B. A new principle for assessing vibrotactile sense in vibration‐induced neuropathy. Scand J Work Environ Health 1987 ; 13: 375–379.
21. 21 Lundborg G, Dahlin LB, Lundström R, Necking LE, Strömberg T. Vibrotactile function of the hand in compression and vibration‐induced neuropathy. Sensibility index: a new measure. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1992 ; 26: 275–279.
22. 22 Lundström R, Strömberg T, Lundborg G. Vibrotactile perception threshold measurements for diagnosis of sensory neuropathy. Description of a reference population. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1992 ; 64: 201–207.
23. 23 Kaczmarek KA, Webster JG, Bach‐y‐Rita P, Tompkins WJ. Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1991 ; 38: 1–16.
24. 24 Johansson RJ, Vallbo AB. Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. J Physiol (Lond) 1979 ; 286: 283–300.
25. 25 Johansson RJ, Vallbo ÅB. Detection of tactile stimuli. Threshold of afferent units related to psychophysical threshold in human hand. J Physiol (Lond) 1979 ; 297: 405–422.
26. 26 Johansson RJ, Vallbo ÅB. Spatial properties of the population of mechanoreceptive units in the glabrous skin of human hand. Brain Res 1980 ; 184: 353–366.
27. 27 Johansson RJ, Vallbo ÅB, Westlig G. Thresholds of mechanoreceptive afferents in the human hand as measured with von Frey hairs. Brain Res 1980 ; 184: 343–351.
28. 28 Sakada S. Physiology of mechanical senses of the oral structure. In: Kawamura Y, ed. Frontiers of oral physiology. Oral sensory mechanism. Basel: Karger, 1983: 1–32.
29. 29 van Steenberghe D. The structure and function of peri‐odontal innervation. A review of the literature. J Periodont Res 1979 ; 14: 185–203.
30. 30 Sakada S, Maeda K. Characteristics of innervation and nerve ending in cat's mandibular periosteum. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 1967 ; 8: 77–94.
31. 31 Sakada S, Maeda K. Correlation between histological structure and response to pressure of mechanoreceptors in the cat mandibular periosteum. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 1967 ; 8: 181–196.
32. 32 Héiaud J, Orofino I, Trub M, Mei N. Electrophysiologic evidence showing the existence of sensory receptors within the alveolar bone in anesthetized cats. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996 ; 11: 800–805.
33. 33 König E. The use of masking limitations in clinical audiom‐etry. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 1962 ; 180: 1–51.