Predicting Yarn Tenacity: A Comparison of Mechanistic, Statistical, and Neural Network Models

Journal of the Textile Institute

Volumn 92, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 139-145

  Guha, Anirban ^a   Chattopadhyay, R ^a   Jayadeva, ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FIBER PROPERTY; NEURAL NETWORK; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; POLYESTER YARN; TENACITY; TESTING; YARN PROPERTY;

EID: 0035742229     PISSN: 00405000     EISSN: 17542340     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00405000108659564     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aggarwal, S. K., 1989a. A Model to Estimate the Breaking Elongation of High Twist Ring Spun Cotton Yarns. Part I:Derivation of the Model for Yarns from Single Cotton Varieties. Text. Res. J., 59 (11):691–695.
2. Aggarwal, S. K., 1989b. A Model to Estimate the Breaking Elongation of High Twist Ring Spun Cotton Yarns Part II:Applicability to Yarns from Mixtures of Cottons. Text. Res. J., 59 (12):717–720.
3. Bogdan, J. F., 1956. The Characterization of Spinning Quality. Text. Res. J., 26 (No, 9):720–730.
4. Bogdan, J. F., 1967. The Prediction of Cotton Yarn Strengths. Text. Res. J., 37 (No. 6):536–537.
5. Cheng, L., and Adams, D. L., 1995. Yarn Strength Prediction Using Neural Networks. Part I:Fiber Properties and Yarn Strength Relationship. Text. Res. J., 65 (No, 9):495–500.
6. DeLuca, L. B., Smith, B., and Waters, W. T., 1990. Analysis of Factors Influencing Ring Spun Yam Tenacities for a Long Staple Cotton. Text. Res. J., 60 (8):475–482.
7. El Mogahzy, Y. E., 1988. Selecting Cotton Fiber Properties for Fitting Reliable Equations to HVI Data. Text. Res. J., 58 (7):392–397.
8. El Sourady, A. S., Worley, S., Jr. and Stith, L. S., 1974. The Relative Contribution of Fiber Properties to Variations in Yam Strength in Upland Cotton Gossypium hirsutum L. Text. Res. J., 44 (4):301–306.
9. Ethridge, M. D., Towery, J. D., and Hembree, J. F., 1982. Estimating Functional Relationships Between Fiber Properties and the Strength of Open-End Spun Yams. Text. Res. J., 52 (No, 1):35–45.
10. Frydrych, I., 1992. A New Approach for Predicting Strength Properties of Yam. Text. Res. J., 62 (No. 6):340–348.
11. Hafez, O. M.A., 1978. Yarn-Strength Prediction of American Cottons. Text. Res. J., 48 (No. 12):701–705.
12. Hearle, J. W.S., Grosberg, P., and Backer, S., 1969. Structural Mechanics of Fibers, Yarns and Fabrics, Vol. 1, New York, NY, USA:Wiley-Interscience.
13. Hunter, L., 1988. Prediction of Cotton Processing Performance and Yam Properties from HVI Test Results. Melliand Textilberichte, 229–232 (E 123-E 124).
14. Kim, Y. K., and El-Shiekh, A., 1984a. Tensile Behaviour of Twisted Hybrid Fibrous Structures. Part I:Theoretical Investigation. Text. Res. J., 54 (No. 8):526–534.
15. Kim, Y. K., and El-Shiekh, A., 1984b. Tensile Behaviour of Twisted Hybrid Fibrous Structures. Part II:Experimental Studies. Text. Res. J., 54 (No. 8):534–543.
16. Linhart, H., 1975. Estimating the Statistical Anomaly of the Underlying Point Process—The Proper Approach to Yarn Irregularity. Text. Res. J., 45 (No. 1):1–4.
17. Lucas, L. J., 1983. Mathematical Fitting of Modulus-Strain Curves of Poly(ethylene Terephthalate) Industrial Yarns. Text. Res. J., 53 (No. 12):771–777.
18. Majumdar, P.K., 1993. Influence of Fibre Characteristics on Spinning Stability and Structure Property Relationship of Rotor and Ring Spun Yarns. Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology-Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, India.
19. Martindale, J. G., 1945. A New Method of Measuring the Irregularity of Yarns with Some Observations on the Origin of Irregularities in Worsted Slivers and Yarns. J. Text. Inst., 36:T35–T47.
20. Morris, P. J., Merkin, J. H., and Rennell, R. W., 1999. Modelling of Yam Properties from Fibre Properties. J. Text. Inst., 90:322–335.
21. Neelakantan, P., and Subramanian, T. A., 1976. An Attempt to Quantify the Translation Fiber Bundle Tenacity into Yam Tenacity. Text. Res. J., 46 (No. 11):822–827.
22. Önder, E., and Baser, G., 1996. A Comprehensive Stress and Breakage Analysis of Staple Fiber Yams. Part II:Breakage Analysis of Single Staple Fiber Yarns. Text. Res. J., 66 (No. 10):634–640.
23. Pan, N., 1992. Development of a Constitutive Theory for Short Fiber Yams. Part I:Mechanics of Staple Yam Without Slippage Effect. Text. Res. J., 62 (No. 12):749–765.
24. Pan, N., 1993a. Development of a Constitutive Theory for Short Fiber Yarns. Part II:Mechanics of Staple Yarn With Slippage Effect. Text. Res. J., 63 (No. 10):504–514.
25. Pan, N., 1993b. Development of a Constitutive Theory for Short Fiber Yams. Part III:Effects of Fiber Orientation and Bending Deformation. Text. Res. J., 63 (No. 10):565–572.
26. Pitt, R. E., and Phoenix, L., 1981. On Modelling the Statistical Strength of Yams and Cables Under Localized- Load Sharing Among Fibers. Text. Res. J., 51 (No. 6):408–425.
27. Pynckels, F., Kiekens, P., Sette, S., Van Langenhove, L., and Impe, K., 1997. The Use of Neural Nets to Simulate the Spinning Process. J. Text. Inst., 88:440–448.
28. Rajamanickam, R., Hansen, S. M., and Jayaraman, S., 1997. Analysis of the Modelling Methodologies for Predicting the Strength of Air-Jet Spun Yams. Text. Res. J., 67 (No. 1):39–44.
29. Rajamanickam, R., Hansen, S. M., and Jayaraman, S., 1998a. A Model for the Tensile Fracture Behaviour of Air- Jet Spun Yarns. Text. Res. J., 68 (No. 9):654–662.
30. Rajamanickam, R., Hansen, S. M., and Jayaraman, S., 1998b. Studies on Fiber-Process-Structure-Property Relationships in Air-jet Spinning. Part I:The Effect of Process and Material Parameters on the Structure of Microdenier Polyester-fiber/Cotton Blended Yarns. J. Text. Inst., 89:214–242.
31. Rajamanickam, R., Hansen, S. M., and Jayaraman, S., 1998c. Studies on Fiber-Process-Structure-Property Relationships in Air-Jet Spinning. Part II:Model Development. J. Text. Inst., 89:243–265.
32. Ramesh, M. C., Rajamanickam, R., and Jayaraman, S., 1995. The Prediction of Yarn Tensile Properties by Using Artificial Neural Networks. J. Text. Inst., 86:459–469.
33. Smith, B., and Waters, B., 1985. Extending Applicable Ranges of Regression Equations for Yarn Strength Forecasting. Text. Res. J., 55 (No. 12):713–717.
34. Subramanian, T. A., Ganesh, K., and Bandyopadhyay, S., 1974. A Generalized Equation for Predicting the Lea Strength of Ring-spun Cotton Yams. J. Text. Inst., 65:307–313.
35. Van Langenhove, L., 1997a. Simulating the Mechanical Properties of a Yarn Based on the Properties and Arrangement of Its Fibers. Part I:The Finite Element Model. Text. Res. J., 67 (No. 4):263–268.
36. Van Langenhove, L., 1997b. Simulating the Mechanical Properties of a Yarn Based on the Properties and Arrangement of Its Fibers. Part II:Results of Simulations. Text. Res. J., 67 (No. 5):342–347.
37. Van Langenhove, L., 1997c. Simulating the Mechanical Properties of a Yarn Based on the Properties and Arrangement of Its Fibers. Part III:Practical Measurements. Text. Res. J., 67 (No. 6):406–412.
38. Zeidman, M. I., Suh, M. W., and Batra, S. K., 1990. A New perspective on Yarn Unevenness:Components and Determinants of General Unevenness. Text. Res. J., 60 (No. 1):1–6.
39. Zurek, W., 1975. The Structure of Yarn, Foreign Scientific Publications Department of the National Center for Scientific, Technical and Economic Information, Warsaw, Poland.
40. Zurek, W., Frydrych, I., and Zakrzewski, S., 1987. A Method of Predicting the Strength and Breaking Strain of Cotton Yarn. Text. Res. J., 57:439–444.
41. Zurek, W., and Krucinska, I., 1984. A Probailistic Model of Fiber Distribution in Yarn Surface as a Criterion of Quality. Text. Res. J., 54 (No. 8):504–515.