Private insurance company involvement in the U.S. crop insurance program

Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 557-566

  Ker, Alan P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035740077     PISSN: 00083976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2001.tb00326.x     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Ker, A. 1999. Private insurance companies and the U.S. crop insurance program. Choices.
2. Ker, A. and K. Coble. 2002. Modeling conditional yield densities. American Journal of Agricultural Economics (forthcoming).
3. Ker, A. and P. McGowan. 2000. Weather-based adverse selection and the U.S. crop insurance program: The private insurance company perspective. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 25 (2): 386-410.
4. Miranda, M. and J. Glauber. 1997. Systematic risk, reinsurance, and the failure of crop insurance markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79: 206-15.
5. Racine, J, and A. Ker. 2001. Nonparmetric rating of crop insurance policies: adversely selecting against the FCIC/RMA. Working Paper. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Department of Economics.
6. Skees, J. R. 1999. Agricultural risk management or income enhancement? Regulation.
7. Skees, J. R. 2001. The bad harvest. Regulation.
8. Wright, B. D. and J. A. Hewitt. 1994. All-risk crop insurance: Lessons from theory and experience. In Economics of Agricultural Crop Insurance: Theory and Evidence. edited by D. L. Hueth and W. H. Furtan. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.