|
|
Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 113-116
|
|
Distal hypospadias repair: Comparison of two different techniques
a
|
|
Author keywords
Boys; Childhood; Distal hypospadias; Repair
|
|
Indexed keywords
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
CHILD;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DISEASE SEVERITY;
ESTHETICS;
HUMAN;
HYPOSPADIAS;
INFANT;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
PENIS GLANS;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
SURGICAL MORTALITY;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
URETHRA;
URETHRA FISTULA;
URETHRA FUNCTION;
URETHRA STRICTURE;
COHORT ANALYSIS;
FOLLOW UP;
MALE GENITAL SYSTEM SURGERY;
METHODOLOGY;
PLASTIC SURGERY;
PRESCHOOL CHILD;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
CHILD;
CHILD, PRESCHOOL;
COHORT STUDIES;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HUMANS;
HYPOSPADIAS;
INFANT;
MALE;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SURGICAL FLAPS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MALE;
|
|
EID: 0035739107
PISSN: 03011623
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1023/A:1014485810245 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (3)
|
|
References (10)
|
