Issue definition, conflict expansion, and tort reform: Lessons from the American general aviation industry

Policy Studies Journal

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 571-587

  Tarry, Scott E ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

^b Department of Public Administration ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL POLICY; LEGISLATION; MANUFACTURING;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0035736954     PISSN: 00190292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2001.tb02111.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Tort changes fly
2. Small airplane makers hope bill rescues industry
3. Outlook for light airplanes brightens/legislation prompts manufacturers to increase output
4. Cessna returns to producing small planes
5. Agendas, alternatives, and public policy: Lessons from the U.S. foreign policy arena
6. Preparing for takeoff: Aviation bill approval will mean thousands of jobs
7. Filibuster halts liability bill; supporters look to 1995
8. General Aviation Revitalization Act: Its effect on manufacturers
9. Trial lawyers mobilize
10. Big spending paid off in tort battle
11. Aircraft liability bill may create Tulsa jobs, officials say
12. Ralph Nader's museum of liability
13. Trial lawyers face new challenge
14. Reframing policy discourse
15. Problem definition, agenda access, and policy choice
16. The high cost of lawsuits
17. Russ Meyer central figure in evolution of aviation liability law
18. Trial lawyers, under fire, take case to politicians
19. Trial lawyers face a new charge
20. Causal stories and the formation of political agendas
21. Rhetoric and reality: Tort reform and the uncertain future of general aviation
22. The rise and fall of general aviation: Product liability, market structure, and technological innovation
23. Comparing three lenses of policy choice