Use of an SF 6-based diagnostic tool for assessing air distributions and oxygen transfer rates during IAS operation

Bioremediation Journal

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 337-347

  Bruce, Cristin L ^a   Amerson, Illa L ^b   Johnson, Richard L ^b   Johnson, Paul C ^a  

^a Arizona State University   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR CONCENTRATIONS; AIR DISTRIBUTION; AIR INJECTION; AIR SPARGING; CONSERVATIVE TRACERS; DIAGNOSTIC TESTS; DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS; GROUNDWATER PRESSURE; IN-SITU; OXYGEN DELIVERY; OXYGEN DISTRIBUTION; OXYGEN MASS TRANSFER; OXYGEN TRANSFER RATE; TEST DATA; TIME-PERIODS; VADOSE ZONE;

AQUIFERS; CHEMICAL PROPERTIES; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; HELIUM; OXYGEN;

SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE;

EID: 0035718511     PISSN: 10889868     EISSN: 15476529     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/20018891079366     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Ahlfeld, D. P., A. Dahmani, and W. Ji. 1994. A Conceptual Model of Field Behavior of Air Sparging and Its Implications for Application. Ground Water Monitor. Remed. 14 (4):132-139.
2. Amerson, I.L. 1997. Diagnostic Tools for the Monitoring and Optimization of In Situ Air Sparging Systems. M.S. Thesis. Arizona State University.
3. Amerson, I.L., C.L. Bruce, P.C. Johnson, and R.L. Johnson. 2001. A Multi-Tracer Push-Pull Diagnostic Test for In Situ Air Sparging Systems. Bioremed. J. 5(4):349-362.
4. Bass, D.H. and R.A. Brown. 1995. Performance of Air Sparging Systems - a Review of Case Studies. In: Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water: Prevention, Detection and Restoration, Houston, TX, November.
5. Bird, R.B., W.E. Stewart, and E.N. Lightfoot. 1960. Transport Phenomena. John Wiley & Sons. NY. 780 p.
6. Johnson, R.L.; R.R. Dupont, and D.A. Graves. 1996. Assessing UST Corrective Action Technologies: Diagnostic Evaluation of In Situ SVE-Based System Performance. EPA/600/R-96/041, 164p.
7. Johnson, P.C. 1998. Assessment of the Contributions of Volatilization and Biodegradation to In Situ Air Sparging Performance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32:276-281. (Pubitemid 28093391)
8. Johnson, P.C., R.L. Johnson, C. Neaville, E.E. Hansen, S.M. Stearns, and I.J. Dortch. 1997. An Assessment of Conventional In Situ Air Sparging Tests. Ground Water 35 (5):765-774. (Pubitemid 127493085)
9. Johnson, P.C. R.L. Johnson, C.L. Bruce, and A. Leeson. 2001a. Advances in In Situ Air Sparging/Biosparging. Bioremed. J. 5(4):251-266.
10. Johnson, P.C., A. Leeson, R.L. Johnson, C.M. Vogel, R.E. Hinchee, M. Marley, T. Peargin, C.L. Bruce, I.L. Amerson, C.T. Coonfare, and R.D. Gillespie. 2001b. A Practical Approach for the Selection, Pilot Testing, Design, and Monitoring of In Situ Air Sparging/Biosparging Systems. Bioremed. J. 5(4):267-281.
11. Johnson, R.L., P.C. Johnson, T.L. Johnson, N.R. Thomson, and A. Leeson. 2001a. Diagnosis of In Situ Air Sparging Performance Using Transient Groundwater Pressure Changes During Startup and Shutdown. Bioremed. J. 5(4):299-320.
12. Johnson, R.L., P.C. Johnson, T.L. Johnson, and A. Leeson. 2001b. Helium Tracer Tests for Assessing Contaminant Vapor Recovery and Air Distribution During In Situ Air Sparging. Bioremed. J. 5(4):321-336.