|
|
Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 1279-1280
|
|
Commentary: Mercury, PCB, and now eicosapentaenoic acid: Still another reason why pregnant women should be concerned about eating seafood?
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
DOCOSAHEXAENOIC ACID;
FATTY ACID;
FISH OIL;
ICOSAPENTAENOIC ACID;
MERCURY;
POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYL;
FOOD CONSUMPTION;
MERCURY (ELEMENT);
PCB;
PREGNANCY;
ANIMAL EXPERIMENT;
ARTICLE;
BLOOD ANALYSIS;
BLOOD LEVEL;
CLINICAL STUDY;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CULTURAL FACTOR;
FATTY ACID METABOLISM;
FETOTOXICITY;
FETUS GROWTH;
FOOD CONTAMINATION;
FOOD INTAKE;
FOOD SAFETY;
GROWTH INHIBITION;
HIGH RISK POPULATION;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION;
MATERNAL NUTRITION;
NERVE CELL DIFFERENTIATION;
NONHUMAN;
PREGNANCY;
PREMATURITY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RAT;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SEA FOOD;
SOCIOECONOMICS;
UMBILICAL CORD BLOOD;
|
|
EID: 0035713646
PISSN: 03005771
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1093/ije/30.6.1279 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (16)
|
|
References (12)
|
