Top be or not Top be

Revista de Calidad Asistencial

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 83-85

  Meneu, Ricard ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RESPONSIBILITY;

EID: 0035712335     PISSN: 1134282X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1134-282X(01)77387-3     Document Type: Editorial

References (11)

1. Los top 20 2000: Objetivos, ventajas y limitaciones del método
2. Los mejores hospitales. Entre la necesidad de información comparativa y la confusión
3. In search of America's best hospitals. The promise and reality of quality assessment
4. Le palmarès des hôpitaux
5. The public release of performance data: What do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence
6. Results of report cards for patients with congestive hearth failure depende on the method used to adjust for severity
7. Learning from differences within the NHS. Clinical indicators should be used to learn, not to judge