Intrauterine devices - Perceptions overestimate the hazards

European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 231-233

  Gupta, S ^a   Kirkman, R ^a  

^a Hurst Road Health Center   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; FEMALE INFERTILITY; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; LETTER; PELVIC INFLAMMATORY DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 0035707936     PISSN: 13625187     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713604267     Document Type: Letter

References (27)

1. Frameless vs the classical IUD for contraception (protocol)
2. Women's contraceptive attitudes and use in 1992
3. Reproductive mortality in the United States; recent trends and methodological considerations
4. Factors governing IUD performance
5. Proceed with caution during difficult IUD insertions
6. Insertion technique, not design affects expulsion rates of post partum IUD
7. The clinic factor in evaluating IUDs
8. Incidence, prevalence and trends of acute pelvic inflammatory disease and its consequences in individualised countries
9. A multinational case control study of ectopic pregnancy
10. Intrauterine devices and upper genital tract infections
11. Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: An international perspective
12. Antibiotic prophylaxis for insertion of intrauterine devices
13. Intrauterine devices: An update on clinical performance
14. Return of fertility in nulliparous women after discontinuation of the intrauterine device: Comparison with women discontinuing other methods of contraception
15. Intrauterine devices and infertility: Sifting through the evidence
16. Dose and age dependent ectopic pregnancy risks with intrauterine contraception
17. How effectively do copper IUDs prevent ectopic pregnancy?
18. A meta analysis of case control studies of use of intrauterine devices and risk of ectopic pregnancy
19. Long term reversible contraception - Twelve years experience with Cu T 380A and T Cu 220 C
20. Implantable contraceptives vs other forms of reversible contraceptives: 2 Systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost effectiveness
21. Protective effect of intrauterine release of levonorgestrel on pelvic infection. Three years comparative experience of levonorgestrel and copper releasing intrauterine devices
22. Levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine device in the treatment of menorrhagia
23. Perforations with intrauterine devices. Report from a Swedish survey
24. Contraceptive health risks - Women's perceptions