Strength-of-preference indicators and an ordered-response model for ordinarily dichotomous, discrete choice data

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 70-93

  Swallow, Stephen K ^a   Opaluch, James J ^a   Weaver, Thomas F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; SURVEYING; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EID: 0035706611     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jeem.2000.1125     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation
2. Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities
3. Testing willingness-to-pay models of discrete choice contingent valuation survey data
4. Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation
5. Dichotomous-choice, contingent-valuation questions: Functional form is important
6. A new paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data: Maximum likelihood estimation by censored logistic regression
7. Estimation using contingent valuation data from a "dichotomous choice with follow-up" questionnaire
8. Sensitivity of willingness-to-pay estimates to bid design in dichotomous choice contingent valuation models
9. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses
10. Some issues in continuous- and discrete-response contingent valuation studies
11. Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation
12. Improving the contingent valuation method: A psychological perspective
13. Starting point bias in dichotomous choice valuation with follow-up questioning
14. A satisfactory benefit-cost indicator from contingent valuation
15. Estimating stated preferences with rated-pair data: Environmental, health, and employment effects of energy programs
16. Asymmetries in ordered strength of preference models: Implications of focus shift for discrete choice preference estimation
17. Contingent valuation focus groups: Insights from ethnographic interview techniques
18. Consequences of using different question formats in contingent valuation: A Monte Carlo study
19. Optimal experimental design for double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation
20. Design of sequential experiments for contingent valuation studies
21. Bias in discrete response contingent valuation
22. Sensitivity of willingness-to-pay estimates to bid design in dichotomous choice valuation models: Comment
23. Discrete choice under preference uncertainty: An improved structural model for contingent valuation
24. Conjoint analysis of deer hunting
25. Comparison of contingent preference models
26. Decision making when choices are complex: A test of Heiner's hypothesis
27. Confuser surplus
28. Evaluating impacts from noxious facilities: Including public preferences in current siting mechanisms
29. Measuring the difference in mean willingness to pay when dichotomous choice contingent valuation responses are not independent
30. Bidding games for valuation of aesthetic environmental improvements
31. Using conjoint analysis to derive estimates of compensating variation
32. The Logistic Procedure
33. Conjoint analysis of groundwater protection programs
34. Some notes on trichotomous choice discrete valuation
35. Siting noxious facilities: An approach that integrates technical, economic, and political considerations
36. Heterogeneous preferences and aggregation in environmental policy analysis: A landfill siting case
37. Recreation demand models with taste differences over people
38. Elicitation effects in contingent valuation: Comparisons to a multiple bounded discrete choice approach