Why we should eliminate the due date: A truth in jest

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 98, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 1127-1129

  Katz, Vern L ^a,b   Farmer, Richard ^a   Tufariello, Jennifer ^a   Carpenter, Mary ^a  

^a Sacred Heart Medical Center Eugene   (United States)

^b Ctr Genet and Matern Fetal Med   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCULATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONCEPTION; DELIVERY; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; MENSTRUAL CYCLE; OBSTETRIC CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; ULTRASOUND;

EID: 0035693876     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01606-4     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Naegele's rule: A reappraisal
2. Estimating the date of confinement: Ultrasonographic biometry versus certain menstrual dates
3. Duration of human singleton pregnancy - A population based study