Masculinism, Emplacement, and Positionality in Peer Review

Professional Geographer

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 511-521

  Berg, Lawrence D ^a  

^a Okanagan University College   (Canada)

Author keywords

Emplacing knowledge; Feminist theory; Masculinism; Partial knowledges; Peer review

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 0035693264     PISSN: 00330124     EISSN: 14679272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0033-0124.00301     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Anzaldua, G. 1987. Borderlands/La Frontera: The new Mestiza. San Francisco: Spinsters/Aunt Lute Press.
2. Bakanic, Y, C. McPhail, and R. J. Simon. 1989. Mixed messages: Referees’ comments on the manuscripts they review. The Sociological Quarterly 30 (4):639-54.
3. Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Translated by C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
4. Barnes, T. J. 1993. Whatever happened to the philosophy of science? Environment and Planning A 25: 301-4.
5. Barnes T. J., and J. Duncan. 1992. Introduction: Writing worlds. In Writing worlds: Discourse, text, and metaphor in the representation of landscape, ed. T. J. Barnes and J. Duncan, 1-17. London: Routledge.
6. Barnes, T. J., and D. Gregory. 1997. Worlding geography: Geography as situated knowledge. In Reading human geography: The poetics and politics of inquiry, ed. T. J. Barnes and D. Gregory, 13-26. London: Arnold.
7. Barnett, C., and M. Low. 1996. Speculating on theory: Towards a political economy of academic publishing. Area 28:13-24.
8. Berg, L. D. 1994. Masculinity, place, and a binary discourse of theory and empirical investigation in the human geography of Aotearoa/New Zealand. Gender, Place and Culture 1 (2):245-60.
9. Berg, L. D., and R. A. Kearns. 1998. America unlimited. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 16:128-32.
10. Berry, B. J. L. 1995. Peer review: Is it working? Urban Geography 16 (8):655-56.
11. Blank, R. M. 1991. The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: Experimental evidence from The American Economic Review. The American Economic Review 81 (5):1041-67.
12. Bondi, L. 1997. In whose words? On gender identi-ties, knowledge, and writing practices. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 22 (2):245-58.
13. Bondi, L. 1998. On referees and anonymity: A comment on Symanski and Pickard. Progress in Human Geography 22 (2):293-98.
14. Boots, B. 1996. Referees as gatekeepers: Some evidence from geographic journals. Area 28 (2):177-85.
15. Bordo, S. 1986. The Cartesian masculinization of thought. Signs 11:439-56.
16. Brunn, S. D. 1988. The manuscript review process and advice to prospective authors. The Professional Geographer 40:8-14.
17. Butler, J. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the sub-version of identity. London: Routledge.
18. Chubin, D. E., and E. J. Hackett. 1990. Peerless science: Peer review and U.S. science policy. New York: SUNY Press.
19. Cockburn, C. 1985. Machinery of dominance: Women, men, and technological change. London: Pluto Press.
20. Connel, R. 1995. Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21. Dinitto, D. 1990. Journal reviews: Is gender an issue? The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science 26 (2):173-76.
22. Dixon, D. P., and J. P. Jones III. 1996. For a supercali-fragilisticexpialidocious scientific geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 86:767-79.
23. Dodson, B. 1995. Nontraveling theory: A review of IBG ’95 from the periphery. Area 16:275-78.
24. Frankenberg, R., and L. Mani. 1993. Crosscurrents, crosstalk: Race, “postcoloniality,” and the politics of location. Cultural Studies 7:292-310.
25. Gibson-Graham, J. K. 1996. The end of capitalism (as we knew it): A feminist critique of political economy. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
26. Glesler, L. J. 1986. Some notes on refereeing. The American Statistician 40 (4):310-12.
27. Goodstein, D. 1995a. Ethics and peer review. Bio/ Technology 13 (6):618.
28. Goodstein, D. 1995b. Peer review after the big crunch. American Scientist 83:401-2.
29. Gregory, D., and J. Urry, eds. 1985. Social relations and spatial structures. London: Macmillan.
30. Hamermesh, D. S. 1994. Facts and myths about refereeing. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (1):153-63.
31. Haraway, D. 1991. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
32. Hargens, L. L., and J. R. Herting. 1990. A new approach to referees’ assessments of manuscripts. Social Science Research 19:1-16.
33. Hart, J. F. 1990. Canons of good editorship. The Professional Geographer 42 (3):354-58.
34. Hirschman, D. J. 1994. Peer review and the contract between science and society. The Environmental Professional 16:78-89.
35. Jay, N. 1981. Gender and dichotomy. Feminist Studies 7:38-56.
36. Johnston, R. J. 1991. Geography and geographers. 4th ed. Auckland: Edward Arnold.
37. Keller, E. F. 1985. Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38. Key, W. H. 1990. Notes on reviewing the article and recommending publication. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science 26 (2):177-78.
39. Laband, D., and M. Piette. 1994. Does the “blind-ness” of peer review influence manuscript selection efficiency? Southern Economic Journal 60 (4): 896-906.
40. Larner, W 1995. Theorizing identity in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Gender, Place and Culture 2:177-90.
41. Lefebvre, H. 1991. The production of space. Translated by D. Nicholson-Smith. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
42. Leslie, C. 1990. Scientific racism: Reflections on peer review, science, and ideology. Social Science and Medicine 31 (8):891-912.
43. Lloyd, G. 1984. The man of reason: “Male” and “female” in Western philosophy. London: Methuen.
44. Longhurst, R. 1994. Reflections on and a vision for feminist geography. New Zealand Geographer 50:14-19.
45. Longhurst, R. 1995. The body and geography. Gender, Place and Culture 2 (1):97-105.
46. Massey, D. B. 1984. Introduction: Geography matters. In Geography matten! A reader, ed. D. B. Massey and J. Allen, 1-11. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
47. Massey, D. B. 1993. Power geometry and a progressive sense of place. In Mapping the futures, ed. J. Bird, B. Curtis, G. Robertson, and L. Tickner, 59-69. London: Routledge.
48. McDowell, L. 1990. Sex and power in academia. Area 11 (4):323-32.
49. Mohanty, C. T. 1991. Cartographies of struggle: Third world women and the politics of feminism. In Third world women and the politics of feminism, ed. C. Mohanty, A. Russo, and L. Torres, 1-47. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
50. Morris, M. 1992. Afterthoughts on Australianism. Cultural Studies 6 (3):468-75.
51. Nagar, R., and S. Geiger. 2000. Reflexivity, positionality, and identity in feminist fieldwork: Beyond the impasse. Unpublished; available from senior author, Department of Women’s Studies, Univer-sity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
52. O’Brien, R. M. 1991. The reliability of composites of referee assessments of manuscripts. Social Science Research 20:319-28.
53. Orme, A. R. 1990. Responsibility and editorship. The Professional Geographer 42 (3):361-63.
54. Peters, D., and S. Ceci. 1982. Peer review practices of psychology journals: The fate of published arti-cles. In Peer commentary on peer review, ed. S. Harnad, 2-11. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
55. Pile, S., and N. Thrift. 1995. Mapping the subject. In Mapping the subject: Geographies of cultural transformation, ed. S. Pile and N. Thrift, 13-51. New York: Routledge.
56. Polak, J. F. 1995. The role of the manuscript reviewer in the peer review process. American Journal of Radiology 165:685-88.
57. Rose, G. 1993. Feminism and geography: The limits of geographical knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
58. Rose, G. 1997. Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities, and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography 21 (3):305-20.
59. Rushton, J. P., and A. F. Bogaert. 1989. Population differences in susceptibility to AIDS: An evolu-tionary analysis. Social Science and Medicine 28 (12): 1211-20.
60. Seidler, V. J. 1991. Recreating sexual politics: Men, feminism, and politics. London: Routledge.
61. Seidler, V. J. 1994. Unreasonable men: Masculinity and social theory. London: Routledge.
62. Slater, D. 1992. On the borders of social theory: Learning from other regions. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 10:307-27.
63. Slater, D. 1993. The geopolitical imagination and the enframing of development theory. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 18:419-37.
64. Spivak, G. C. 1988. Can the subaltern speak? In Marxism and the interpretation of culture, ed. C. Nelson and L. Grossberg, 271-313. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
65. Symanski, R., and J. Pickard. 1996. Rules by which we judge one another. Progress in Human Geography 20 (2):175-82.
66. Taylor, P. J. 1990. Journeyman editor. The Professional Geographer 42 (3):359-60.
67. Wheeler, J. O. 1993. Consensus among critics? The editorial review process. Urban Geography 14 (2): 111-13.
68. Wheeler, J. O. 1995. Major control points in Urban Geography, 1980-1994. Urban Geography 16 (1):1-3.
69. Yankauer, A. 1991. How blind is blind review? American Journal of Public Health 81 (7):843-45.