Support of universal newborn hearing screening among mothers and health care providers

Ambulatory Child Health

Volumn 7, Issue 3-4, 2001, Pages 283-295

  Wall, Terry C ^a,c   Peralta Carcelen, Myriam ^a   Fargason Jr , Crayton A ^a   Evans, H Hughes ^a   Snyder, Erin Dunn ^a   Woolley, Audie L ^b  

^a University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

^b Kentucky   (United States)

^c Division of Pediatric Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision support techniques; Decision making; Patient participation; Practice guidelines; Preferences; Universal newborn hearing screening

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; AUDIOLOGY; COMPUTER; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST MINIMIZATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MATERNITY WARD; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MOTHER; NEWBORN SCREENING; OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PEDIATRICIAN; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUERPERIUM; SCORING SYSTEM; TIME; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

EID: 0035690447     PISSN: 13555626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-0658.2001.00138.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children
2. American Academy of Pediatrics Joint Committee on Infant Hearing 1994 position statement
3. American Academy of Pediatrics Newborn and Infant Hearing Loss: Detection and Intervention
4. Perspectives on a state enacted hearing screening and assessment program in the newborn population
5. Screening infants for hearing impairment
6. Neonatal at risk screening and the identification of deafness
7. Early identification of congenital sensorineural hearing impairment
8. Effectiveness and efficacy of early detection of hearing impairment in children
9. Field sensitivity of targeted neonatal hearing screening by transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions
10. European consensus statement on neonatal hearing screening
11. The Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Program: Experience with statewide hearing screening (1993-96)
12. Universal newborn hearing screening using transient evoked otacoustic emissions: Results of the Rhode Island hearing assessment project
13. Survey of parents' perceptions regarding hospital-based newborn hearing screening
14. The views of parents of hearing impaired children on the need for neonatal hearing screening
15. Maternal anxiety and attitudes to universal neonatal hearing screening
16. The analytic hierarchy process in medical decision making: A tutorial
17. Medical decision making using the analytic hierarchy process: Choice of initial antimicrobial therapy for acute pyelonephritis
18. Preferences of pregnant women and physicians for two strategies for prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis in neonates
19. Evoked otoacoustic emissions in newborn hearing screening
20. The newborn with hearing loss: Detection in the nursery
21. Universal newborn hearing screening: Feasibility in a community hospital
22. Potential pitfalls of initiating a newborn hearing screening program
23. Universal newborn hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: Past, present, and future
24. The effectiveness of screening programs based on high-risk characteristics in early identification of hearing impairment
25. Historical, political, and technological content associated with early identification of hearing loss
26. Implementing a statewide system of services for infants and toddlers with hearing disabilities
27. State programs for universal newborn hearing screening
28. Challenges to universal newborn hearing screening in a South Carolina Regional Medical Center
29. The role of the pediatrician in hearing loss: From detection to connection
30. Operating a hospital-based universal newborn hearing screening program using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions
31. Involving patients in complex decisions about their care: An approach using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
32. Analysis of three decision-making methods: A breast cancer patient as a model
33. Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process
34. Facts and fictions about the analytic hierarchy process
35. Incorporating patients' preferences into medical decisions
36. Universal newborn screening for hearing loss: Ideal vs. reality and the role of otolaryngologists
37. Universal screening for infant hearing impairment: Simple, beneficial, and present justified
38. Realities, myths, and challenges of newborn hearing screening in the United States