Can psychoanalysis become empirically supported?

International Forum of Psychoanalysis

Volumn 10, Issue 3-4, 2001, Pages 184-190

  Sandell, Rolf ^a  

^a NONE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Empirical support; Evidence based medicine; Psychoanalysis; Psychoanalytic psychotherapy; Randomized clinical trial

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITIVE THERAPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0035687361     PISSN: 0803706X     EISSN: 16512324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08037060152740089     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Chambless DL, Hollon SD. Defining empirically supported therapies. J Consult Clin Psychol 1998;66: 7-18.
2. Stiles WB, Shapiro DA. Abuse of the drug metaphor in psychotherapy process-outcome research. Clin Psychol Rev 1989; 9:521-43.
3. Lambert MJ. Implications of outcome research for psychotherapy integration. In: Norcross JC, Goldstein MR, eds. Handbook of psychotherapy integration. New York: Basic Books; 1992, p. 94-129.
4. Asay TP, Lambert MJ. The empirical case for the common factors in therapy: quantitative findings. In: Hubble MA, Duncan BL, Miller SD, eds. The heart and soul of change. What works in therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1999, p. 33-56.
5. Goldfried MR, Wolfe BE. Toward a more clinically valid approach to therapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol 1998; 66:143-51.
6. Persons JB, Silberschatz G. Are results of randomized controlled trials useful to psychotherapists ? J Consult Clin Psychol 1998; 66:126-35.
7. Seligman MEP. The effectiveness of psychotherapy. The Consumer Reports study. Amer Psychologist 1995; 50:965-74.
8. Roth A, Fonagy P. What works for whom? A critical review of psychotherapy. New York: Guilford; 1996.
9. DeRubeis RJ, Crits-Christoph P. Empirically supported individual and group psychological treatments for adult mental disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol 1998; 66:37-52.
10. Kazdin AE, Weisz JR. (1998). Identifying and developing empirically supported child and adolescent treatments. J Consult Clin Psychol 1998; 66:19-36.
11. Compas BE., Haaga, DAF, Keefe FJ, Leitenberg H, Williams DA. (1998). Sampling of empirically supported psychological treatments from health psychology: Smoking, chronic pain, cancer, and bulimia nervosa. J Consult Clin Psychol 1998; 66:89-112.
12. Miller NE, Luborsky L, Barber JP, Docherty JP. Psychodynamic treatment research. A handbook for clinical practice. New York: Basic Books; 1993.
13. Grawe K, Donati R, Bernauer F. Psychotherapi e im Wandel. Von der Konfession zur Profession (4. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1994.
14. Fonagy P. ed. An open door review of outcome studies in psychoanalysis (2nd ed). London: International Psychoanalytical Association; 2001.
15. Bachrach HM., Galatzer-Levy R, Skolnikoff A, Waldron Jr S. On the efficacy of psychoanalysis. J Amer Psychoanal Assoc 1991; 39:871-916.
16. Doidge N. Empirical evidence for the efficacy of psychoanalyti c psychotherapies and psychoanalysis. An overview. Psychoanal Inquiry 1997; Supplement: 102-50.
17. Kantrowitz JL. A brief review of psychoanalyti c outcome research. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 1997; Supplement: 87-101.
18. Luborsky L, Diguer L, Luborsky E, Singer B, Dickter D, Schmidt KA. The efficacy of dynamic psychotherapies: is it true that “everyone has won and all must have prizes”? In: Miller NE, Luborsky L, Barber JP, Docherty JP, eds. Psychodynamic treatment research. A handbook for clinical practice. New York: Basic Books; 1974, p. 497-516.
19. Anderson EM, Lambert MJ. Short-term dynamically oriented psychotherapy: a review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 1995;15:503-14.
20. Orlinsky DE, Grawe K, Parks BK. Process and outcome in psychotherapy-Noc h einmal. In: Bergin AE, Garfield SL eds. Handbook of psychotherap y and behavior change (4th ed.). New York: Wiley; 1994, p. 270-378
21. Kernberg O, Burstein E, Coyne L, Appelbaum A, Horwitz L, Voth H. (1972). Psychotherapy and psychoanalysis: final report of the Menninger Foundation Psychotherapy Research Project. Bull Menninger Clinic 1972; 36:1-275.
22. Wallerstein RS. Forty-two lives in treatment. A study of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. New York: Guilford; 1986.
23. Erle J. An approach to the study of analyzabilit y and analysis: the course of forty consecutive cases selected for supervised analysis. Psychoanal Q 1979; 48:198-228.
24. Weber J, Bachrach H, Solomon M. Factors associated with the outcome of psychoanalysis: report of the Columbia Psychoanalytic Center Research Project (II). Int R Psychoanal 1985; 12:127-41.
25. Weber J, Bachrach H, Solomon M. Factors associated with the outcome of psychoanalysis: report of the Columbia Psychoanalytic Center Research Project (III). Int R Psychoanal 1985; 12:251-62.
26. Jones EE, Katz A, Paolitto F. Follow-up of psychoanalysi s five-to-ten years after termination: I. Stability of psychological change. J Amer Psychoanal Assoc 1990; 38:471-96.
27. Kantrowitz J, Katz A, Paolitto F, Sashin J, Solomon L. Changes in level and quality of object relations in psychoanalysis: follow-up of alongitudinal prospective study. J Amer Psychoanal Assoc 1987; 35:23-46.
28. Sashin J, Eldred S, Van Amerrowgen ST. A search for predictive factors in institute supervised cases: a retrospective study of 183 cases from 1959-1966 at the Boston Psychoanalytic Society and Institute. Int J Psychoanal 1975; 56:343-59.
29. Dührssen A. Katamnestische Ergebnisse bei 1004 Patienten nach analytischer Psychotherapie. Z Psychosom Medizin 1962; 8:94113.
30. Dührssen A, Jorswieck E. Eine empirisch-statistische Untersuchung zur Leistungsfahigkeit psychoanalytischer Behandlung. Der Nervenarzt 1965; 36:166-9.
31. Teufel R, Volk W. Erfolg und Indikation stationärer psychotherapeutischer Langzeittherapie. In: Ehlers W, Traue HC, Czogalik D, eds. Bio-psycho-soziale Medizin. Berlin: Springer; 1988:33146.
32. Rudolf G. Free University of Berlin: Berlin Psychotherapy Study. In: Beutler L, Crago M, eds. Psychotherapy research. An international review of programmatic studies. Washington: American Psychological Association; 1991.
33. Rudolf G, Manz R, Ori C. Ergebnisse der psychoanalytischen Therapien. Z Psychosom Medizin 1994; 40:25-40.
34. Dossman R, Kutter P, Heinzel R, Wurmser L. The long-term benefits of intensive psychotherapy: A view from Germany. Psychoanal Inquiry 1997; Supplement: 74-86.
35. Heinzel R. (2001). Psychotherapi e verringert Gesundheitskosten-Ambulante analytische Einzel-und Gruppenpsychotherapi e in einer bundesweiten katamnestische n Evaluationsstudie. In: Stuhr U, Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Beutel M, eds. Langzeitpsychotherapie. Perspektiven für Therapeuten und Wissenschaftler. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 2001:356-78.
36. von Rad M, Senf W, Bräutigam W. Psychotherapie und Psychoanalyse in der Krankenversorg: Ergebnisse der Heidelberger Katamneseprojektes. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik und medizinische Psychologie 1998; 48:88-100.
37. Keller W, Westhoff G, Dilg R, Rohner R, Studt HH. Wirksamkeit und Kosten-Nutzen-Aspekt e ambulanter (jungianischer) Psychoanalysen und Psychotherapien-Eine katamnestische Studie. In: Stuhr U, Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Beutel M, eds. Langzeitpsychotherapie. Perspektiven für Therapeuten und Wissenschaftler. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 2001:343-55.
38. Beutel, M. & Rasting, M. Langzeittherapien aus der Rückschau ehemaliger Patienten. In: Stuhr U, Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Beutel M, eds. Langzeitpsychotherapie. Perspektiven für Therapeuten und Wissenschaftler. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 2001:187-202.
39. Leuzinger-Bohleber, M. Katamnesen-ihre klinische Relevanz. In: Stuhr U, Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Beutel M, eds. Langzeitpsychotherapie. Perspektiven für Therapeuten und Wissenschaftler. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 2001:160-86.
40. Rüger B. Statistisches Design und Repräsentativitet der psychoanalytischen Katamnese-Studie (DPV). In: Stuhr U, Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Beutel M, eds. Langzeitpsychotherapie. Perspektiven für Therapeuten und Wissenschaftler. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 2001:149-59.
41. Stuhr U. Methodische Überlegungen zur Kombination qualitativer und quantitative r Methoden in der psychoanalytissche n Katamneseforschun g und Hinweise zu ihrer Integration. In: Stuhr U, Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Beutel M, eds. Langzeitpsychotherapie. Perspektiven für Therapeuten und Wissenschaftler. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 2001:133-48.
42. Blomberg J, Lazar A, Sandell R. Outcome of patients in longterm psychoanalytica l treatments. First findings of the Stockholm Outcome of Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis (STOPP) study. Psychotherapy Research; in press.
43. Sandell R, Blomberg J, Lazar A, Carlsson J, Broberg J, Schubert J. Varieties of long-term outcome among patients in psychoanalysis and long-term psychotherapy. A review of findings in the Stockholm Outcome of Psychoanalysi s and Psychotherap y Project (STOPP). Int J Psychoanal 2000; 81:921-42.
44. Fisher S, Greenberg RP. Freud scientifically reappraised. Testing the theories and therapy. New York: Wiley; 1996.
45. Luborsky L, Diguer L et al. The researcher’s own therapy allegiances: A “wild card” in comparisons of treatment efficacy. Clin Psychol-Science & Practice 1999; 6:95-106.