Effects of injury severity and cognitive exaggeration on olfactory deficits in head injury compensation claims

NeuroRehabilitation

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 237-243

  Green, P ^a   Iverson, G L ^b  

^a University of British Columbia ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Anosmia; Brain injury; Neuropsychological assessment; Olfaction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANOSMIA; ATTENUATION; COGNITION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISABILITY; DOSE RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEAD INJURY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENT; OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION; ORTHOPEDICS; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; REVIEW; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0035685530     PISSN: 10538135     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/nre-2001-16408     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Detecting exaggeration and malingering in neuropsychological assessment
2. Malingering: Differential diagnosis
3. Common sense, clinicians, and actuarialism in the detection of malingering during head injury litigation
4. A preliminary profile of neuropsychological deficits associated with major depression
5. Neuropsychological outcome at one year post head injury
6. Depressive symptoms and neurocognitive test scores in patients passing symptom validity tests
7. Effect sizes of impairment associated with symptom exaggeration versus definite traumatic brain injury
8. Abnormal neuropsychological findings are not necessarily a sign of cerebral impairment: A matched comparison between chronic fatigue syndrome and multiple sclerosis
9. Impairment of olfactory recognition after closed head injury
10. Olfactory dysfunction in man: Anatomical and behavioral aspects
11. Posttraumatic anosmia and orbital frontal damage: Neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric correlates
12. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in head trauma
13. Exaggeration of anosmia in 80 litigating head injury cases
14. Olfactory dysfunction in patients with head trauma
15. Detecting malingering in head injury litigation with the Word Memory Test
16. Using the Word Memory Test to detect biased responding in head injury litigation
17. Validation of the computerized assessment of response bias in litigating patients with head injuries
18. Validation of the Word Memory Test in 400 consecutive compensation claimants, including 196 cases of head injury
19. Severe traumatic brain injury performance on CARB and the WMT
20. Performance of neurological patients on CARB and the WMT