Effect of ageing on otoacoustic emissions and efferent suppression in humans;Efectos de la edad en las emisiones otoacústicas y (EN LA) supresión eferente en humanos

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 308-312

  Quaranta, Nicola ^a   Debole, Salvatore ^b   Di Girolamo, Stefano ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b LD of Surgical Semeiotics   (Italy)

Author keywords

Efferent; Otoacoustic emissions; Presbyacusis; Suppression

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM FUNCTION; AUDITORY SYSTEM PARAMETERS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MOTOR NERVE CONDUCTION; NOISE POLLUTION; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; STAPES; TYMPANOMETRY; WHITE NOISE;

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS;

EID: 0035684390     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00206090109073127     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin B, Martin G. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 2027–2067
2. Hofstetter P, Ding D L, Powers N, Salvi R. Quantitative relationship of carbo-platin dose to magnitude of inner and outer hair cell loss and the reduction in distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitude in chinchillas. Hear Res 1997; 112: 199–215
3. Warr W, Guinan J JJ. Efferent innervation of organ of Corti: two separate systems. Brain Res 1979; 173: 152–155
4. Warr W, Guinan J JJ, White J. Organization of the efferent fibers: the lateral and medial olivocochlear systems. Neurobiology of hearing: the cochlea, R, Altschuler, D, Hoffman, R, Bobbin. Raven Press, New York 1986; 333–348
5. Collet L, Kemp D, Veuillet E, Duclaux R, Moulin A. Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micromechanical properties of human subjects. Hear Res 1990; 42: 251–262
6. Veuillet E, Collet L, Duclaux R. Effect of contralateral auditory stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables. J Neurophysiol 1991; 65: 724–735
7. Dallos P, He D, Lin X, Sziklai I, Metha S, Evans B. Acetylcholine, outer hair cell electromotility, and the cochlear amplifier. J Neurosci 1997; 17: 2212–2226
8. Kawase T, Liberman M C. Antimasking effects of olivocochlear reflex. I. Enhancement of compound action potentials to masked tones. J Neurophysiol 1993; 70: 2532
9. Liberman M C, Guinan J JJ. Feedback control of the auditory periphery: antimasking effect of middle ear muscles vs olivo-cochlear efferents. J Com Disord 1998; 31: 471–483
10. Micheyl C, Perrot X, Collet L. Relationship between auditory intensity discrimination in noise and olivo-cochlear efferent system activity in humans. Behav Neurosci 1997; 111: 801–807
11. Zheng X Y, Henderson D, Hu B H, Ding D L, McFadden S L. The influence of the cochlear efferent system on chronic acoustic trauma. Hear Res 1997; 107: 147–159
12. Zheng X Y, Henderson D, McFadden S L, Hu B H. The role of the cochlear efferent system in acquired resistance to noise-induced hearing loss. Hear Res 1997; 104: 191–203
13. Schuknecht H. Further observation on the pathology of presbycusis. Arch Otolaryngol 1964; 80: 369–382
14. Schulte B, Schmeidt R. Lateral wall Na, K-ATPase and endocochlear potentials decline with age in quiet reared gerbils. Hear Res 1992; 61: 35–46
15. Mills D, Norton S, Rubel E. Vulnerability and adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions to endocochlear potential variation. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 2108–2122
16. Schuknecht H. Pathology of the ear. Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1974
17. Working Group on Speech Understanding and Aging. Speech understanding and aging. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 83: 859–895
18. Schuknecht H, Gacek M. Cochlear pathology in presbycusis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993; 102: 1–16
19. Bonfils P, Bertrand Y, Uziel A. Evoked otoacoustic emissions: normative data and presbycusis. Audiology 1988; 27: 27–35
20. Collet L, Moulin A, Gartner M, Morgon A. Age-related changes in evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99: 993–997
21. Lonsbury-Martin B, Cutler W, Martin G. Evidence for the influence of aging on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 1749–1759
22. Stover L, Norton S. The effect of aging on otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 2670–2681
23. Castor X, Veuillet E, Morgon A, Collet L. Influence of aging on active cochlear micromechanical properties and on the medial olivocochlear system in humans. Hear Res 1994; 77: 1–8
24. Collet L, Veuillet E, Berger-Vachon C, Morgon A. Evoked otoacoustic emissions: relative importance of age, sex and sensori-neural hearing-loss using a mathematical model of the audiogram. Int J Neurosci 1992; 62: 113–122
25. Prieve B, Falter S. COAEs and SSOAEs in adults with increased age. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 521–528
26. Veuillet E, Collet L, Morgon A. Differential effects of ear-canal pressure and contralateral acoustic stimulation on evoked otacoustic emissions in humans. Hear Res 1992; 61: 47–55