There is poor agreement between manual auscultatory and automated oscillometric methods for the measurement of blood pressure in normotensive pregnant women

Journal of Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 398-403

  Pomini, F ^a   Scavo, M ^a   Ferrazzani, S ^a   De Carolis, S ^a   Caruso, A ^a   Mancuso, S ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Blood pressure; Device validation; Korotkoff; Oscillometric; Pregnancy

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; AUSCULTATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DEVICE; FEMALE; HEART SOUND; HUMAN; OSCILLOMETRY; PREECLAMPSIA; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0035679645     PISSN: 10570802     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/jmf.10.6.398.403     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. A new instrument for determining the minimum and maximum blood pressures in man
2. Blood pressure monitoring: Automated oscillometric devices
3. Recommendations for human blood pressure determination by sphygmomanometers: Report of a special task force appointed by the Steering Committee, American Heart Association
4. The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of automated and semi-automated blood pressure measuring devices with special reference to ambulatory system
5. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement
6. Un nuovo sfigmomanometro
7. Recommendations on blood pressure measurement
8. The classification and definition of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
9. Report on high blood pressure in pregnancy. Consensus report
10. Automated blood pressure measurement devices: A potential source of morbidity in preeclampsia?
11. Pregnancy-related hypertension
12. What is blood pressure?