Applying survey research methods to account for denied access to research sites on private property

Wetlands

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 639-647

  Lesser, V M ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Access rate; Environmental survey; Nonresponse bias

Indexed keywords

ACCESS RESTRICTION; ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH; PRIVATE LAND; SAMPLING BIAS; SURVEYING; WETLAND;

EID: 0035676418     PISSN: 02775212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1672/0277-5212(2001)021[0639:ASRMTA]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Return postage in mail surveys: A meta-analysis
2. A response to the nonresponse problem
3. Estimating the effect of incentives on mail survey response rates: A meta-analysis
4. Social environmental impacts on survey cooperation
5. The effects of response-stimulating factors on response rates and data quality in mail survyes: A test of Dillman's total design method
6. How prenotice letters, stamped return envelopes, and reminder postcards affect mailback response rates for census questionniares
7. Research access to privately owned wetland basins in the prairie pothole region of the United States
8. A test of vegetation-related indicators of wetland quality in the prairie pothole region
9. Private lands: The neglected geography
10. Site access considerations for obtaining landowner consent for the 1995/1996 EMAP wetlands demonstration study in North Dakota
11. Private property rights: The conflict and the movement
12. An EPA program for monitoring ecological status and trends
13. Low-flying biologists set to become endangered species
14. Informed consent: Consequences for response rate and response quality in social surveys
15. Trends in nonresponse rates, 1952-1979
16. Current population survey, design and methodology