Loss rates of butterfly species with urban development. A test of atlas data and sampling artefacts at a fine scale

Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 10, Issue 11, 2001, Pages 1831-1837

  Dennis, Roger L H ^a   Hardy, Peter B ^b  

^a OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Conurbations; Dispersal; Distributions; Lepidoptera; Sampling artefacts; Vagrants

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; LOCAL EXTINCTION; SAMPLING BIAS; SPECIES DIVERSITY; URBANIZATION;

UNITED KINGDOM;

LEPIDOPTERA;

EID: 0035675223     PISSN: 09603115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1013161522916     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Progressive bias in species status is symptomatic of fine-grained mapping units subject to repeated sampling
2. The impact of extreme weather on Great Orme populations of Hipparchia semele (Linnaeus 1758) and Plebejus argus (Linnaeus 1758) (Papilionoidea: Satyrinae and Lycaenidae): Hindsight, inference and lost opportunities
3. Targeting squares for survey: Predicting species richness and incidence for a butterfly atlas
4. Bias in butterfly distribution maps: The effects of sampling effort
5. Bias in butterfly distribution maps: The influence of hot spots and recorder's home range
6. The impact of urban development on butterflies within a city region
7. Butterfly mobility