Risk perception of heavy metal soil contamination and attitudes toward decontamination strategies

Risk Analysis

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 967-

  Weber, O ^a   Scholz, R W ^a   Buhlmann R ^a   Grasmuck D ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Decontamination; Environmental risk; Heavy metal contamination; Risk perception; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

BIOREMEDIATION; CONTAMINATION; HEAVY METALS; SOILS;

ESTHETICAL PERFORMANCE;

RISKS;

HEAVY METAL;

HEAVY METAL; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; RISK FACTOR; SOIL POLLUTION;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ESTHETICS; EXHAUST GAS; HUMAN; OZONE LAYER; POPULATION EXPOSURE; POPULATION RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL TREATMENT; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0035669924     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0272-4332.215165     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Perspektiven integraler Beweutung zur Sanierung Schwermetallbelasteter Böden: Hat Phytoremediation eine chance?
2. Die Anwendung des Donator-Akzeptor-Modells am Beispiel Blei für den Pfad "Boden-Mensch."
3. Induktiv-stochastische Risikoabschätzung mit dem Donator-Akzeptor-Modell am Beispiel der Gesundheitsbelastung durch cadmiumbelastete Weizenackerböden
4. Risk perception and worries after the Chernobyl accident
5. Chernobyl: Four years later: Attitudes, risk management and communication
6. Contaminated soil: Public reactions, policy decisions, and risk communication
7. Knowledge and risk perception among nuclear power plant employees
8. Risk perception and the value of safety
9. Perception of risk
10. Intuitive toxicology. II. Expert and lay judgements of chemical risks in Canada
11. Judgements of chemical risks: Comparisons among senior managers, toxicologists, and the public
12. Im schnittfeld wirtschaft, recht und individuum: «sanfte» bodensanierung zwischen theorie und praxis
13. Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risks
14. Perception of risk: Reflections on the psychometric paradigm
15. Credibility, information preferences, and information
16. Judgements of personal and environmental risks of consumer products - Do they differ?