Addressing negative willingness to pay in dichotomous choice contingent valuation

Environmental and Resource Economics

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 173-195

  Bohara, Alok K ^a   Kerkvliet, Joe ^b   Berrens, Robert P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Contingent valuation; Monte Carlo simulation; Negative willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

CONTINGENT VALUATION (CV); WILLINGNESS TO PAY (WTP);

MIXTURES; RESOURCE VALUATION; SIMULATION;

RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EID: 0035662610     PISSN: 09246460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1012642902910     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Testing willingness to pay models of discrete choice contingent valuation data
2. Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies
3. A randomized response approach to dichotomous choice contingent valuation
4. Exploring the nonmarket social impacts of environmental policy change
5. Valuing the protection of minimum instream flows in New Mexico
6. Use of dichotomous choice nonmarket methods to value the whooping crane resource
7. Validation of empirical measures of welfare change
8. Respondent experience and contingent valuation of environmental goods
9. Efficient estimation methods for close-ended contingent valuation surveys
10. Estimation using contingent valuation data from a "dichotomous choice with follow-up" questionnaire
11. Estimation using contingent valuation data from "dichotomous choice with follow-up" questionnaire: Reply
12. A referendum design and contingent valuation: The NOAA-panel's no-vote recommendation
13. Economic analysis, endangered species and the safe minimum standard
14. Natural resource damage assessment: Speculations about a missing perspective
15. The return of the grey wolf
16. Estimating the economic benefits of voiding food-borne risk: Is willingness to pay feasible
17. Inference and optimal design for a welfare measure in dichotomous choice contingent valuation
18. Incorporating respondent uncertainty when estimating willingness to pay for protecting critical habitat for threatened and endangered fish
19. Comparing three approaches that generate bids for the referendum contingent valuation method
20. Alternative methods for handling negative willingness to pay in referendum models
21. Referendum models and economic values: Theoretical, intuitive, and practical bounds on willingness to pay
22. The statistical analysis of discrete-response CV data
23. Tensions rise as fishing resumes for Coho off Oregon Coast
24. Preservation or use: A contingent valuation study of wilderness preservation in Utah
25. Spike models in contingent valuation
26. The relative unimportance of non-market willingness to pay for timber harvesting
27. Analyzing conflict between cultural heritage and nature conservation in the Australian alps: A CVM approach
28. Alternative approaches for incorporating respondent uncertainty when estimating willingness to pay: The case of the Mexican spotted owl
29. Damned if you do and damned if you don't: Nonuse stated preferences in Salmon preservation policy
30. The contingent valuation debate: Why economists should care
31. Why existence values should not be used in cost-benefit analysis
32. Allowing for zeros in dichotomous-choice contingent-valuation models
33. Wolves, Politics and the Nez Perce: Wolf Recovery in Central Idaho and the Role of Native Tribes