Introduction to the final Special Section in the Special Series on the utility of the Rorschach for clinical assessment

Psychological Assessment

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 419-422

  Meyer, G J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; REVIEW;

HUMANS; PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RORSCHACH TEST;

EID: 0035661134     PISSN: 10403590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.13.4.419     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Two methods for studying the incremental validity of a Rorschach variable
2. Toward a resolution of the Rorschach controversy
3. A comparative meta-analysis of Rorschach and MMPI validity
4. The clinical utility of the Rorschach: Unfulfilled promises and an uncertain future
5. Whither the Rorschach? An analysis of the evidence
6. Introduction to the Special Series on the utility of the Rorschach for clinical assessment
7. The hard science of Rorschach research: What do we know and where do we go?
8. MMPI, Rorschach, and WAIS: A meta-analytic comparison of reliability, stability, and validity
9. Meta-analytic methods, the Rorschach, and the MMPI
10. The Rorschach: Toward a nomothetically based, idiographically applicable configurational model
11. A review of recent research addressing the utility of the Rorschach
12. The Rorschach: Facts, fictions, and future
13. Advancing the science of psychological assessment: The Rorschach Inkblot Method as exemplar