|
Volumn 104, Issue 12, 2001, Pages 1134-1139
|
Reliability of conventional radiography, CT and MRI in the diagnosis of acute hyperflexion trauma to the foot. A prospective clinical study;Diagnostische wertigkeit von nativröntgen, computer- und magnetresonanztomographie beim akuten hyperflexionstrauma des fußes. Eine prospektive klinische studie
a b c a a |
Author keywords
Conventional radiography; CT; Diagnosis; Hyperflexion injury; Lisfrancjoint; MRI; Prospective clinical study
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING;
FEMALE;
FOOT INJURY;
FOOT RADIOGRAPHY;
HUMAN;
IMAGE QUALITY;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LIGAMENT INJURY;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
RELIABILITY;
ADULT;
DISLOCATIONS;
FEMALE;
FOOT INJURIES;
FRACTURES, BONE;
HUMANS;
LIGAMENTS, ARTICULAR;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
MALE;
METATARSAL BONES;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SPRAINS AND STRAINS;
TARSAL BONES;
TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;
|
EID: 0035660954
PISSN: 01775537
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s001130170004 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (32)
|
References (31)
|