The tooth fairy, Santa Claus, and the hard core drinking driver

Injury Prevention

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 272-275

  Chamberlain, E ^a   Solomon, R ^b  

^a MADD Canada ^*  (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL INTOXICATION; ARTICLE; CANADA; CAR DRIVING; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; UNITED STATES;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; ALCOHOL DRINKING; ALCOHOLIC INTOXICATION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; CANADA; HUMAN; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0035654486     PISSN: 13538047     EISSN: 14755785     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/ip.7.4.272     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Morrison S. Promoting responsible consumption. On Tap 1999;13:1.
2. Century Council. The national hardcore drunk driver project. Washington: Century Council, 1993.
3. National Licensed Beverage Association. NLBA grassroots action stops .08 BAC amendment (news release). Alexandria, VA: NLBA, 28 September 1999.
4. Latham WR III. A critical review of two NHTSA studies. Washington, DC: American Beverage Institute, 1997.
5. American Beverage Institute. The .08 debate: what's the harm? Washington, DC: American Beverage Institute, 1997.
6. Donelson AC. The alcohol-crash problem and its persistence: the need to deal effectively with the hard core of drinking drivers. 34th International Institute on the Prevention and Treatment of Alcoholism. Pontault-Combault, France, 8 June 1989.
7. Simpson HM. The repeat offender: future directions for impaired driving programs and policies. Countermeasures conference. Toronto, Ontario, 22 February 1993.
8. Beirness DJ, Mayhew DR, Simpson HM. DWI repeat offenders: a review and synthesis of the literature. Ottawa: Health Canada, 1997.
9. Therien E. One for the road [editorial]. Globe and Mail 18 January 2001.
10. An Act to amend the Criminal Code (impaired driving and related matters), Statutes of Canada 1999, c32.
11. An Act to amend the Criminal Code (impaired driving causing death and other matters), Statutes of Canada 2000, c25.
12. Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights. Toward eliminating impaired driving. Ottawa: Publications Service, 1999.
13. Moskowitz H, Fiorentino D. A review of the literature on the effects of low doses of alcohol on driving related skills.Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2000.
14. Moskowitz H, Burns M, Fiorentino D, et al. Driver characteristics and impairment at various BACs.Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2000.
15. Howat P, Sleet D, Smith I. Alcohol and driving: is the 0.05% blood alcohol concentration limit justified? Drug Alcohol Rev 1991;10:151-66.
16. Borkenstein RF, Crowther RF, Shumate RP, et al. The role of the drinking driver in traffic accidents. Bloomington: Indiana University Department of Police Administration, 1964.
17. McLean AJ, Holubowycz OT, Sandow BL. Alcohol and crashes: identification of relevant factors in this association. Adelaide: Federal Office of Road Safety, 1980.
18. Perrine MW, Waller JA, Harris LS. Alcohol and highway safety: behavioural and medical aspects. Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, 1971.
19. Mercier-Guyon C. Lowering the BAC limit to 0.05: results of the French experience. Transportation Research Board 77th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC, 11-15 January 1998.
20. Norström T, Laurell H. Effects of lowering the legal BAC-limit in Sweden. In: Mercier-Guyon C, ed. Alcohol, drugs and traffic safety,T-'97. Annecy: Centre d'études et de recherche en médecine du trafic, 1997: 87-94.
21. Henstridge J, Homel R, MacKay P. The long-term effects of random breath testing in four Australian states: a time series analysis. Canberra: Federal Office of Road Safety, 1997.
22. Simpson HM, Mayhew DR, Beirness DJ. Recommendations for improving the impact of federal impaired driving laws. Submission to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights. Ottawa: Traffic Injury Research Foundation, 1999.
23. Canada, Department of Justice. Government to strengthen impaired driving law (news release). 7 June 1999.
24. Beer Institute. High risk drivers are over-represented in crashes (news release). 27 July 2000.
25. Simpson HM, Mayhew DR, Beirness DJ. Dealing with the hard core drinking driver. Ottawa: Traffic Injury Research Foundation, 1996.
26. Sweedler BM. Strategies for dealing with the persistent drinking driver. Washington, DC: National Transportation Safety Board, 1997.
27. Bailey JPM, Bailey ML. Hard-core drinking drivers in New Zealand.Whitby, NZ: Bailey Partnership Ltd, 2000.
28. Brewer RD,Morris PD, Cole TB, et al. The risk of dying in alcohol-related automobile crashes among habitual drunk drivers. N Engl J Med 1994;331:513-22.
29. Siegal HA, Falck RS, Carson RG, et al. The hardcore drunk driving offender. Dayton: Centre for Interventions, Treatment and Addictions Research, 2000.
30. Wieczorek WF, Callahan CP, Nochajski TH. An empirical typology of persistent drinking drivers. Buffalo: Center for Health and Social Research at Buffalo State College, 2000.
31. Statistics Canada. Statistical report on the health of Canadians, 1996-1997. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, 1999.
32. Gliksman L, Demers A, Adlaf EM, et al. Canadian campus survey 1998. Toronto: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 2000.
33. Wechsler H, Lee JE, Kuo M, et al. College binge drinking in the 1990s: a continuing problem. Results of the Harvard School of Public Health 1999 College Alcohol Study. Boston: Harvard School of Public Health, 2000.
34. Heale P, Stockwell T, Dietze P, et al. Patterns of alcohol consumption in Australia, 1998. Perth: National Drug Strategy, 2000.
35. Simpson HM, Beirness DJ, Mayhew DR. National opinion poll on drinking and driving. Ottawa: Traffic Injury Research Foundation, 1999.
36. New Zealand Travel Survey 1997/98. Wellington, NZ: Land Transport Safety Authority, 1999.
37. Royal D. Volume I: Findings - National survey of drinking and driving behaviour. Washington, DC: Gallup Organization and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2000.
38. Snyder MB. Driving under the influence: a report to congress on alcohol limits. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1992.
39. Jones RK, Lacey JH. State of knowledge of alcohol-impaired driving: research on repeat DWI offenders. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2000.