Controlled balloon inflation reduces long-term restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

Journal of Invasive Cardiology

Volumn 13, Issue 12, 2001, Pages 774-781

  Unverdorben, Martin ^a   Glaeser, Petra ^a   Degenhardt, Ralf ^a   Rippin, Gerd ^a,b   Berthold, Heiner K ^a   Vallbracht, Christian ^a  

^a Center for Cardiovascular Diseases   (Germany)

^b JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Balloon angioplasty; Computers in cardiology; Inflation time; Pressure slope; Vascular trauma

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOASSAY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; RESTENOSIS; TIME; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; ENDPOINT DETERMINATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECURRENCE; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0035651130     PISSN: 10423931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Marso S, Ellis S, Raymond R. Intracoronary stenting: An overview for the clinician. Cleve Clin J Med 1999;66:434-442.
2. Unverdorben M, Vallbracht C. Stents in the second decade - Meshes maturate? Prog Biomed Res 1999;4:23-31.
3. vom Dahl J, Silber H, Buettner G, et al. Rotational atherectomy versus balloon angioplasty for diffuse in-stent restenosis: Preliminary results of a randomized multicentre trial (ARTIST) Trial). Am J Cardiol 1999;84:88P.
4. Bottner R, Hardigan K. High-speed rotational ablation for in-stent restenosis. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997;40:144-149.
5. Shawl F. High-speed rotational atherectomy for in-stent restenosis. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1996;38:116A.
6. Bossi I, Klersy C, Black A, et al. Improved angiographic results following excimer laser debulking for in-stent restenosis are not associated with improved clinical outcome. Am J Cardiol 1999;84:88P.
7. Sharma S, Kini A, Duvvuri S, et al. Randomized trial of rotational atherectomy versus balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis (ROSTER). J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31(Suppl A):142A.
8. Cantor WJ, Hellkamp AS, Peterson ED, et al. Achieving optimal results with standard balloon angioplasty: Can baseline and angiographic variables predict stent-like outcomes? J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1883-1890.
9. Rodriguez A, Ayala F, Bernardi V, et al. Optimal coronary balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting versus primary stent (OCBAS): Immediate and long-term follow-up results. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:1351-1357.
10. Nakamura S, Anzai H, Takagi T, et al. Pressure wire guide provisional coronary stent implantation. J Cardiol 2001;37:191-199.
11. Lafont A, Dubois-Rande JL, Steg PG, et al. The French Randomized Optimal Stenting Trial: A prospective evaluation of provisional stenting guided by coronary velocity reserve and quantitative coronary angiography. FROST Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:404-409.
12. Di Mario C, Moses JW, Anderson TJ, et al. Randomized comparison of elective stent implantation and coronary balloon angioplasty guided by online quantitative angiography and intracoronary Doppler. The DESTINI (Doppler Endpoint Stenting International Investigation) Study Group. Circulation 2000;102:2938-2944.
13. Abizaid A, Pichard AD, Mintz GS, et al. Acute and long-term results of an intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty/provisional stent implantation strategy. Am J Cardiol 1999;84:1298-1303.
14. Cantor WJ, Peterson ED, Popma JJ, et al. Provisional stenting strategies: Systematic overview and implications for clinical decision-making. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1142-1151.
15. Roubin G, Douglas JJ. Influence of balloon size on initial success, acute complications, and restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A prospective randomized study. Circulation 1988;78:557-565.
16. Sarembock I, La Veau P, Sigal S, et al. Influence of inflation pressure and balloon size on the development of intimai hyperplasia after balloon angioplasty. A study in the atherosclerotic rabbit. Circulation 1989;80:1029-1040.
17. Wilentz J, Sanborn T, Haudenschild C, et al. Platelet accumulation in experimental angioplasty: Time course and relation to vascular injury. Circulation 1987;75:636-642.
18. Wilensky R, March K, Gradus-Pizlo I, et al. Vascular injury, repair, and restenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the atherosclerotic rabbit. Circulation 1995;92:2995-3005.
19. Werner C, Bloss P, Kiessling D, et al. Druck-Volumen-Messungen an PTCA-Kathetem mit Ballons niedriger und höherer Compliance. Biomed Technik 1999;44:300-307.
20. Sabate M, Costa MA, Kozuma K, et al. Geographic miss: A cause of treatment failure in radio-oncology applied to intracoronary radiation therapy. Circulation 2000;101:2467-2471.
21. Unverdorben M, Osypka P, Osypka T, et al. A computer-assisted system (CAPS) for controlled balloon dilatation of coronary and peripheral arteries. Comp Biomed Res 1997;30:403-413.
22. Pizzulli L, Jung W, Pfeiffer D, et al. Angiographic results and elastic recoil following coronary excimer laser angioplasty with saline perfusion. J Intervent Cardiol 1996;9:9-18.
23. Tagaki M, Ueda M, Becker A, et al. The Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbit is a suitable experimental model to study differences in tissue response between animal and medical injury after balloon angioplasty. Arterioscl Thromb Vasc Biol 1997;17:3611-3619.
24. Nobuyoshi M, Kimura T, Ohishi H, et al. Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: Pathologic observations in 20 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17:433-439.
25. Ovunc K, Kabukcu M, Aksoyek S, et al. Is there any association between dissection after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and late restenosis? Angiology 1997;48:111-116.
26. Blankenship J, Krucoff M, Werns S, et al. Comparison of slow oscillating versus fast balloon inflation strategies for coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1999;83:675-680.
27. Ilia R, Cabin H, McConnel S, et al. Coronary angioplasty with gradual versus rapid balloon inflation: Initial results and complications. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993;29:199-202.
28. Tenaglia AN, Quigley PJ, Kereiakes DJ, et al. Coronary angioplasty performed with gradual and prolonged inflation using a perfusion balloon catheter: Procedural success and restenosis rate. Am Heart J 1992;124;585-589.
29. van der Lugt A, Gussenhoven EJ, van Birgelen C, et al. Failure of intravascular ultrasound to predict dissection after balloon angioplasty by using plaque characteristics. Am Heart J 1997;134:1075-1081.
30. Rapold H, David P, Guiteras Val P, et al. Restenosis and its determinants in first and repeat coronary angioplasty. Eur Heart J 1987;8:575-586.
31. Kotamaki M, Laustiola K, Syvanne M, Keikkila J. Influence of continued smoking and some biological risk factors on restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Intern Med 1996;240:293-301.
32. Sakai Y, Tomobuchi Y, Hashizume T, et al. Lesion-related factors associated with restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the absence of patient related factors. J Cardiol 1997;29:1-6.
33. Baraschi E, Conger L, Kadipasaoglu, et al. PTCA in angulated segments: Effects of balloon material, balloon length, and inflation sequence on straightening forces in an in vitro model. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1996;39:207-212.
34. Leimgruber P, Roubin G, Hollman J, et al. Restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty in patients with single-vessel disease. Circulation 1986;73:710-717.
35. Ellis S, Shaw R, Gershony G, et al. Risk factors, time course and treatment effect for restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of chronic total occlusion. Am J Cardiol 1989;63:897-901.
36. Black A, Namay D, Niederman A, et al. Tear or dissection after coronary angioplasty. Morphologic correlates of an ischemic complication. Circulation 1989;79:1035-1042.
37. Ellis S, Roubin G, King SB III, et al. Importance of stenosis morphology in the estimation of restenosis after elective transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1989;63:30-34.
38. Weintraub WS, Kosinski A, Brown C, King SB III. Can restenosis after coronary angioplasty be predicted from clinical variables? J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:6-14.
39. Kent K. Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1988;61:67G-70G.
40. Van Belle E, Bauters C, Hubert E, et al. Restenosis rates in diabetic patients: A comparison of coronary stenting and balloon angioplasty in native coronary vessels. Circulation 1997;96:1454-1460.
41. Asakura Y, Suzuki M, Nonogi H, et al. Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). J Cardiovasc Risk 1998;5:331-334.
42. Johansson S, Wiklund O, Karlsson T, et al. Serum lipids and lipoproteins in relation to restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Eur Heart J 1991;12:1020-1028.
43. Gurlek A, Dagalp Z, Oral D, et al. Restenosis after transluminal coronary angioplasty: A risk factor analysis. J Cardiovasc Risk 1995;2:51-55.
44. Kastrati A, Schomig A, Elezi S, et al. Interlesion dependence of the risk for restenosis in patients with coronary stent placement in multiple lesions. Circulation 1998;97:2396-2401.
45. Walter DH, Schachinger V, Elsner M, et al. Effect of statin therapy on restenosis after coronary stent implantation. Am J Cardiol 2000;85:962-968.
46. Albrecht J, Hartung C, Simon R. Rechnergestützte Koronardilatation und Modellvorstellungen. Biomed Technik 1989;34:75-76.
47. Albrecht J, Simon R, Hartung C. Quantifizierung der Koronardilatation auf der Basis des Druck-Volumen-Zeit-Verhaltens. Biomed Technik 1991;36:103-111.
48. Murray A, Allen V, Bennett M. Validation of an automated technique for determining the mechanical characteristics of coronary arteries during balloon angioplasty: Laboratory assessment with necropsy segments. Heart 1998;79:608-612.
49. Albrecht J. Biomechanische Modellierung und Konstruktion eines medizinisch-technischen Kontrollgeräts zur Qualitätsverbesserung der Koronar-Dilatation. Faculty of Engineering. Hanover, Germany: University of Hanover, 1992.
50. Demer L. Effect of calcification on in vivo mechanical response of rabbit arteries to balloon dilatation. Circulation 1991;83:2083-2093.
51. Leimgruber PP, Roubin GS, Anderson HV, et al. Influence of intimai dissection on restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1985;72:530-535.
52. Bauters C, Lablanche JM, McFadden EP, et al. Relation of coronary angioscopy findings at angioplasty to angiographic restenosis. Circulation 1995;92:2473-2479.
53. Isner J, Fortin R. Frequency in non-angioplasty patients of morphologic findings reported in coronary arteries treated with transluminal angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1983;7:64A.
54. Jain A, Demer L, Raizner A, et al. In vivo assessment of vascular dilatation during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1987;60:988-992.
55. Demer L, Buechi A, Nishikwawa R, et al. The use of pressure-volume curves to assess the mechanism adequacy of stenosis dilatation by angioplasty. Z Kardiol 1987;76(Suppl 6):37-41.
56. Voigtlaender T, Rupprecht H, Britten M, et al. In vitro examination of the coronary artery wall after balloon angioplasty using intracoronary ultrasound. Int J Card Imaging 1998;14:65-70.
57. van Lankeren W, Gussenhoven E, Qureshi A, van der Lugt A. Intravascular ultrasound and histology. An in vitro assessment of iliac artery angioplasty. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1999;22:50-55.
58. Vrolix MC, Legrand VM, Reiber JH, et al. Heparin-coated Wiktor stents in human coronary arteries (MENTOR Trial). Am J Cardiol 2000;86:385-389.