Comparison of laterally condensed .06 and .02 tapered gutta-percha and sealer in vitro

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 27, Issue 12, 2001, Pages 786-788

  Hicks, M Lamar ^a  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GUTTA PERCHA;

ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; INCISOR; METHODOLOGY; TOOTH DISEASE;

CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL LEAKAGE; GUTTA-PERCHA; HUMAN; INCISOR; ROOT CANAL OBTURATION; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T;

EID: 0035651107     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200112000-00019     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Schafer E. Root canal instruments for manual use: a review. Endod Dent Traumatol 1997;13:51-64.
2. Allison D, Webber C, Walton R. The influence of the method of canal preparation on the quality of the apical and coronal obturation. J Endodon 1979;5:298-304.
3. Swanson K, Madison S. An evaluation of coronal microleakage in endodontically treated teeth. Part I. Time periods. J Endodon 1987;13:56-9.
4. Madison S, Wilcox LR. An evaluation of coronal microleakage in endodontically treated teeth. Part III. In vivo study. J Endodon 1988;14:455-8.
5. Torabinejad M, Ung B, Kettering JD. In vitro bacterial penetration of coronally unsealed endodontically treated teeth. J Endodon 1990;16:566-9.