Estimation of proportion and sensitivity of a qualitative character

Metrika

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 269-280

  Chang, Horng Jinh ^a   Huang, Kuo Chung ^a  

^a TAMKANG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Direct response; Randomized response; Relative efficiency

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035649938     PISSN: 00261335     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001840100109     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Chaudhuri A, Mukherjee R (1987) Randomized response techniques: a review. Statistica Neerlandica 41:27-44
2. Chaudhuri A, Mukherjee R (1988) Randomized response: Theory and techniques. Marcel Dekker, New York
3. Fox J. Tracy P (1986) Randomized response: A method for sensitive surveys. Sage Publication, Beverley Hills
4. Hedayat AS, Sinha BK (1991) Design and inference in finite population sampling. Wiley, New York
5. Kuk AYC (1990) Asking sensitive questions indirectly. Biometrika 77:2, 436-438
6. Mahmood M, Singh S, Horn S (1998) On the confidentiality guaranteed under randomized response sampling: a comparison with several new techniques. Biom. J. 40:2, 237-242
7. Mangat NS (1994) An improved randomized response strategy. J. R. Statist. Soc. B. 56:93-95
8. Mangat NS, Singh R (1990) An alternative randomized response procedure. Biometrika 77:2, 439-442
9. Mangat NS, Singh R, Singh S (1997) Violation of respondent's privacy in Moor's model - its rectification through a random group strategy. Commun. Statist. Theory Meth. 26:3, 743-754
10. Singh S, Singh R, Mangat NS (2000) Some alternative strategies to Moor's model in randomized response sampling. J. Statist. Plann. Infere. 83:243-255
11. Warner SL (1965) Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 60:63-69