The taking of land: Market value compensation should be paid

Journal of Public Economics

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 431-443

  Nosal, Ed ^a,b  

^a FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CLEVELAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035649445     PISSN: 00472727     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00146-8     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Blume L., Rubinfeld D., Shapiro P. The taking of land: When should compensation be paid? Quarterly Journal of Economics. 99:1984;71-92.
2. Fischel W., Shapiro P. Takings, insurance, and Michelman: Comments on economic interpretations of just compensation law. Journal of Legal Studies. 17:1988;269-293.
3. Fischel W., Shapiro P. A constitutional choice model of compensation for takings. International Review of Law and Economics. 9:1989;115-128.
4. Hart O., Moore J. Foundations of incomplete contracts. Review of Economic Studies. 66:1999;115-138.
5. Hermalin B. An economic analysis of takings. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization. 11:1995;64-86.
6. Miceli T., Segerson K. Regulatory takings: When should compensation be paid? Journal of Legal Studies. 23:1994;749-776.
7. Rubenfeld J. Usings. The Yale Law Journal. 102:1993;1077-1163.
8. Segal I. Complexity and renegotiation: a foundation for incomplete contracts. Review of Economic Studies. 60:1999;57-82.
9. Todd, E., 1976. The law of expropriation and compensation in Canada, Carswell.
10. Treanor W. The origins and original significance of the just compensation clause of the fifth amendment. The Yale Law Journal. 94:1985;694-716.