Defensive versus offensive approaches to administrative reform in France (1988-1997): The leadership dilemmas of French prime ministers

Governance

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 99-132

  Bezes, Philippe ^a  

^a Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035649313     PISSN: 09521895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0952-1895.00153     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Aberbach, J. A., R. D. Putnam, and B. A. Rockman. 1981. Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
2. Aberbach, J. A., and B. A. Rockman. 1994. Civil Servants and Policymakers: Neutral or Responsive Competence? Governance 4:461-469.
3. Arthuis, J., and A. Lamassoure, eds. 1996. Rapport sur l'évolution de l'économie nationale et des finances publiques. Rapport déposé par le gouvernement pour le débat d'orientation budgétaire. Mai. Paris: Imprimerie nationale.
4. Ashford, D. E. 1982. British Dogmatism and French Pragmatism: Central-Local Policymaking in the Welfare State. London: George Allen & Unwin.
5. Aucoin, P. 1990. Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxes and Pendulums. Governance 2:115-137.
6. Bergounioux, A., and G. Grunberg. 1992. Le long remords du pouvoir: La parti socialiste français, 1905-1992. Paris: Fayard.
7. Bezes, P. 1994. L'action publique volontariste: Analyse d'une politique de délocalisations. Paris: L'Harmattan.
8. Campbell, C. 1988. The Political Roles of Senior Government Officials in Advanced Democracies. British Journal of Political Science 18:243-272.
9. _. 1995. Does Reinvention Need Reinvention? Lessons from Truncated Managerialism in Britain. Governance 4:479-504.
10. Campbell, C., and B. G. Peters. 1988. The Politics/Administration Dichotomy: Death or Merely Change? Governance 1:79-99.
11. Chaty, L. 1997. L'administration face au management: Centres de responsabilité et Projets de service dans l'administration française. Paris: L'Harmattan.
12. Chrétien, P. 1998. Divine surprise ou éternels regrets? La vacuité de la doctrine juridique du service public. Sociétés Contemporaines 32:11-22.
13. Chirac, J. 1995. Discours. Vendredi 17 février, Porte de Versailles.
14. Commissariat Général du Plan. 1993. Pour un Etat stratège garant de l'intérêt général, Commission "Etat, administration et services publics de l'an 2000." Paris: La Documentation Française.
15. Crozier, M. 1963. Le phénomène bureaucratique. Paris: Le Seuil.
16. Décret portant charte de la déconcentration. 1992. Du 1 juillet.
17. Dyson, K. H. F. 1980.The State Tradition in Western Europe: A Study of an Idea and Institution. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Elgie, R., and M. Maor. 1992. Accounting for the Survival of Minority Governments: An Examination of the French Case, 1988-1991.West European Studies 4:57-74.
19. Feigenbaum, H. B. 1990. Recent Evolution of the French Executive. Governance 3:264-278.
20. Finger, M. 1995. New Public Management - Un débat manqué. Swiss Political Science Review 4:133-148.
21. Finger, M., and B. Ruchat, dir. 1997. Pour une nouvelle approche du management public: Reflexions autour de Michel Crozier. Paris: Seli Arslan.
22. Friedberg, E. 1998. Néo-institutionalisme et ordres locaux. Revue française de science politique 4:507-514.
23. Gamble, A. 1988. The Free Economy and the Strong State: The Politics of Thatcherism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
24. Gore, A. 1993. From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government that Works Better and Costs Less. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, National Performance Review.
25. Hall, P. 1986. Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. New York: Oxford University Press.
26. _. 1993. Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics 3:275-296.
27. Halligan, J. 1997. New Public Sector Models: Reforms in Australia and New Zealand. In J. E. Lane, ed., Public Sector Reform: Rationale, Trends and Problems. London: Sage.
28. Hood, C. 1991. A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration Spring:3-19.
29. Huber, J. D. 1996. Rationalizing Parliament: Legislative Institutions and Party Politics in France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Huchon, J-P. 1993. Jours tranquilles à Matignon. Paris: Grasset.
31. I.N.S.E.E. 1996. Rapport sur les Comptes de la Nation de l'année 1995. Annexe au rapport Economique et financier. Projet de Loi de Finances pour 1997. Comptes et indicateurs économiques, t. II Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.
32. Juppé, A. 1995. Circulaire du 26 juillet 1995 relative à la préparation et à la mise en œuvre de la réforme de 1'Etat et des services publics. In Journal Officiel de la République Française 28 juillet: 11217-19.
33. Keeler, J. T. S. 1993. Opening the Window for Reform. Mandates, Crisis and Extraordinary Policy-Making. Comparative Political Studies 4:433-486.
34. Keraudren, P. 1999. Entre nouveau management public et gouvernance: les spécificités de la réforme de l'administration centrale en Grande-Bretagne. Politiques et Management Public 17:59-92.
35. Kessler, M. C. 1978. L'E.N.A.: La politique de la haute fonction publique. Paris: Presses de la FNSP.
36. Knapp, A. 1994. Le gaullisme après de Gaulle. Paris: Le Seuil.
37. Lane, J.-E., ed. 1997. Public Sector Reform. Rationale, Trends and Problems. London: Sage Publications.
38. Leca, J. 1996. La "Gouvernance" de la France sous la cinquième République: une perspective de sociologie comparative. In F. d'Arcy et L. Rouban, dir., De la Cinquième République àl'Europe. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
39. Loi d'orientation no. 92-125. 1992. Du 6 février, relative àl'administration territoriale de la République.
40. March, J.-G., and J. P. Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions. New York: The Free Press.
41. Mission sur les responsabilités et l'organisation de l'Etat. 1995. L'Etat en France: Servir une nation ouverte sur le monde. Rapport au Premier ministre. Paris: La Documentation Française.
42. North, D. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change end Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Orren, K., and S. Skowronek. 1993. Beyond the Iconography of Order: Notes for a New Institutionalism. In L. C. Dodd and C. Jillson, eds., The Dynamics of American Politics: Approaches and Interpretations. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
44. Padioleau, J.-G. 1981. Quand la France s'enferre. Paris: PUF.
45. Page, E. C. 1992. Political Authority and Bureaucratic Power: A Comparative Analysis. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
46. Peters, B. G. 1987. Politicians and Bureaucrats in The Politics of Policy-Making. In J.-E. Lane, ed., Bureaucracy and Public Choice. London: Sage Publications.
47. _. 1995. The Civil Service in the Consolidation of Democracy. International Social Sciences Journal 143:127-140.
48. Peters, B. G., and D. J. Savoie, eds. 1998. Taking Stock: Assessing Public Sector Reforms. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
49. Pierre, J., ed. 1995. Bureaucracy in the Modern State: An Introduction to Comparative Public Administration. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
50. Pierson, P. 1993. When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change. World Politics 45:595-628.
51. _. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. _. 1997. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence and the Study of Politics. Jean Monnet Chair Papers, no. 44. Florence: European University Institute, Robert Schuman Center.
53. Pollitt, C. 1995. Management Techniques for the Public Sector: Pulpit and Practice. In B. G. Peters and D. J. Savoie, eds., Governance in a Changing Environment. Montreal: McGill-Queen'sUniversity Press.
54. Popper, K. R. 1963. Towards a Rational Theory of Tradition. In Conjunctures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
55. Putnam, R. D. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 42:427-460.
56. Quermonne, J. L., and D. Chagnollaud. 1991. Le gouvernement de la francs sous la Vème République, 4th éd. Paris: Dalloz (4th ed.).
57. Redor, M. J. 1992. De l'Etat légal à l'Etat de droit: L'évolution des conceptions de la doctrine publiciste française, 1879-1914. Paris: Economica.
58. Rocard, M. 1985. A l'épreuve des faits. Paris: Le Seuil.
59. _. 1986. Le Cœur à l'ouvrage. Paris: Odile Jacob.
60. _. 1989. Circulaire du Premier ministre, 23 février 1989. In Le renouveau du service public: Sélection des textes officiels. Paris: Ministère de la Fonction Publique et des Réformes administratives.
61. Rohr, J. A. 1992. French Constitutionalism and the Administrative State: A Comparative Textual Study. Administration and Society 24:224-258.
62. Rosanvallon, P. 1990. L'Etat en France: De 1789 à nos jours. Paris: Le Seuil.
63. Rose, R., and P. Davies. 1994. Inheritance in Public Policy: Change Without Choice in Britain. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
64. Rouban, L. 1994. Le pouvoir anonyme: les mutations de l'Etat à la française. Paris: Presses de la Fondation nationale des sciences politiques.
65. _. 1995. Public Administration at the Crossroads: The End of the French Specificity? In J. Pierre, ed., Bureaucracy in the Modern State: An Introduction to Comparative Public Administration. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
66. Rouban, L. 1997. Les cabinets ministériels (1984-1996). Revue administrative 05/06:253-267; 07/08:373-387; 09/10: 499-509.
67. Rouban, L. 1997. Les cabinets ministériels (1984-1996). Revue administrative 05/06:253-267; 07/08:373-387; 09/10: 499-509.
68. Rouban, L. 1997. Les cabinets ministériels (1984-1996). Revue administrative 05/06:253-267; 07/08:373-387; 09/10: 499-509.
69. _. 1998. La fin des technocrates? Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
70. Sawicki, F., and P. Mathiot. 1999a. Les membres des cabinets ministériels socialistes en France (1981-1993). Part one. Revue française de science politique 1:3-29.
71. _. 1999b. Les membres des cabinets ministériels socialistes en France (1981-1993). Part two. Revue française de science politique 2:231-264.
72. Scharpf, F. W. 1986. Policy Failure and Institutional Reform: Why Should Form Follow Function? International Social Sciences journal 108:179-189.
73. Schmidt, V. A. 1996. from State to Market? The Transformation of French Business and Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74. Selznick, P. 1957. Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Company.
75. Skowronek, S. 1993. The Politics Presidents Make. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
76. Stepan, A. 1985. State Power in the Southern Cone of Latin America. In P. B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, and T. Skocpol., eds., Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77. Strom, K. 1990. Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78. Suleiman, E. 1974. Politics, Power and Bureaucracy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
79. _. 1978. Elites in French Society: The Politics of Survival. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
80. Terry, L. D. 1995. Leadership of Public Bureaucracies: The Administrator as Conservator. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
81. Théret, B. 1992. Régimes économiques de l'ordre politique. Paris: PUF.
82. Thœnig, J.-C. 1996. Les Grands Corps. Pouvoirs 79:107-120.
83. Tompson, W. J. 1993. Krushchev and Gorbachev as Reformers: A Comparison. British Journal of Political Science 23:77-105.
84. Weaver, R. K. 1986. The Politics of Blame Avoidance. Journal of Public Policy 4:371-398.
85. Wilson, J. Q. 1973. Political Organizations. New York: Basic Books.
86. Worms, J.-P. 1974. La redécouverte du politique. In M. Crozier, ed., Où va l'administration française. Paris: Les Editions d'Organisation.