L'émergence des disability studies : État des lieux et perspectives

Sciences Sociales et Sante

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 33-71

  Albrecht, Gary L ^a   Ravaud, Jean François ^b   Stiker, Henri Jacques ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b Centre de Recherche Medecine Sciences   (France)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035649291     PISSN: 02940337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3406/sosan.2001.1535     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Abberley P., 1987, The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability, Disability, Handicap and Society, 2, 5-19.
2. Agnew B., 1999, NIH invites activists into the inner sanctum, Science, 283, 1999-2001.
3. Albrecht G., 1992, The disability business: rehabilitation in America, London and Newbury Park, CA, Sage Publications.
4. Albrecht G., Devlieger P., 1999, The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds, Social Science and Medicine, 48, 977-988.
5. Albrecht G., Seelman K., Bury M., 2001, Handbook of disability studies, Thousand Oaks, CA et Londres, Sage Publications.
6. Albrecht G., Verbrugge L., 1999, The global emergence of disability, In : Albrecht G., Fitzpatrick R., Scrimshaw S., eds, The handbook of social studies in health and medicine, Londres, Sage, 293-307.
7. Altman B.A., Barnartt S.N., 2000, Introducing research in social science and disability: an invitation to social science to « get it », Research in Social Science and Disability, 1, 1-30.
8. Annas G., 1998, Human rights health - the universal declaration of human rights at age 50, The New England Journal of Medicine, 339, 1778-1781.
9. ATD-Quart Monde, 1999, Le croisement des savoirs. Quand le Quart Monde et l'Université pensent ensemble, Paris, Éditions de l'Atelier.
10. Barnartt S.N. Scotch R., sous presse, Contentious political actions in the disability community, Washington, D.C., Gallaudet University Press.
11. Barnes C., Mercer G., 1996, Exploring the divide: illness and disability, Leeds, Disability Press.
12. Barral C., Patterson F., Stiker H.J., Chauvière M., 2000, L'institution du handicap : le rôle des associations, Rennes, Presses Universitaires de Rennes, Collection « des Sociétés ».
13. Benford R.D., Snow D.A., 2000, Framing processes and social movements: an overview, In : Hagan J., Cook K.S., eds, Annual Review of Sociology, Palo Alto, CA.
14. Bérubé M., 1997, The cultural representation of people with disabilities affects us all, The Chronicle of Higher Education, May, 30, B4-B5.
15. Bessis S., 1995, From social exclusion to social cohesion: a policy agenda, Paris, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
16. Bickenbach J., Chatterji S., Badley E.M., Ustün T.B., 1999, Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps, Social Science and Medicine, 48, 1173-1187.
17. Bloch-Lainé F., De l'inadaptation des personnes handicapées, Rapport au Premier Ministre, janvier 1968.
18. Bury M., 1996, Defining and researching disability: challenges and responses, In : Barnes C., Mercer, G., eds, Exploring the divide: illness and disability, Leeds, The Disability Press, 17-38.
19. Castel R., 1995, Les métamorphoses de la question sociale. Une chronique du salariat, Paris, Fayard.
20. Cassuto L., 1999, Whose field is it, anyway? Disability studies in the academy, The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 19, A60.
21. De Jong G., 1979, Independent living: from social movement to analytic paradigm, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 60, 435.
22. Gardou C., 2000, Connaître le handicap, reconnaître la personne, Paris, Erès.
23. Gateaux-Mennecier J., 1989, Bourneville et l'enfance aliénée, Paris, Le Centurion.
24. Gill C., 1998, Disability studies: looking at the FAQ's (frequently asked questions), Alert, 9, 6-14.
25. Gros-Jean C., Padieu R., 1995, Les exclus : comment sortir de l'approche en catégories ?, Revue Française des Affaires Sociales, 49, 5-28.
26. Hughes B., Paterson K., 1997, The social model of disability and the disappearing body: towards a sociology of impairment, Disability and Society, 12, 325-340.
27. Imrie R., 1996, Disability and the city: international perspectives, New York, St. Martin's Press.
28. Kasnitz D., Bonney S., Aftandelian R., Pfeiffer D., 2000, Program and courses in disability studies at Universities and Colleges in Canada, Australia, the United States, the United Kingdom and Norway, Disability Studies Quarterly, 14, 155-183.
29. Linton S., 1998, Disability studies/not disability studies, Disability and Society, 13, 525-540.
30. Manton K., 1988, A longitudinal study of functional change and mortality in the United States, Gerontology: Social Sciences, 43, S153-S161.
31. Mitchell D., Snyder S., 2001, Representation and its discontents: the uneasy home of disability in literature and film, In : Albrecht G., Seelman K., Bury, M., eds, Handbook of disability studies, Thousand Oaks, CA and London, Sage Publications.
32. Mitka M., 1999, Enabling students to deal with the disabled, Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 595-596.
33. Monaghan P., 1998, Pioneering field of disability studies challenges established approaches and attitudes, The Chronicle of Higher Education, Janvier 23, 2.
34. Murray C., Lopez A., 1997, Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: global burden of disease study, The Lancet, 349, 1436-1442.
35. Murphy R., 1987, The body silent. A journey into paralysis, New York, Henry Holt and Company. Traduction française : Vivre à corps perdu, le témoignage et le combat d'un anthropologue paralysé, Paris, Pion, 1990.
36. Murphy R., 1987, The body silent. A journey into paralysis, New York, Henry Holt and Company. Traduction française : Vivre à corps perdu, le témoignage et le combat d'un anthropologue paralysé, Paris, Pion, 1990.
37. National Organization on Disability, 1998, Closing the gaps 1998: Expanding participation of americans with disabilities, Washington DC, National Organization on Disability/Harris Survey.
38. Oliver M., 1992, Changing the social relations of research production, Disability, Handicap and Society, 7, 2, 101-115.
39. Oliver M., 1996, Understanding disability: from theory to practice, London, Macmillan.
40. OMS, 1980, International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps: a manual of classification relating to the consequences of diseases, OMS, Genève (Suisse). Traduction française : Classification internationale des handicaps : déficiences, incapacités et désavantages, un manuel de classification des conséquences des maladies, INSERM, CTNERHI, 1988.
41. OMS, 1980, International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps: a manual of classification relating to the consequences of diseases, OMS, Genève (Suisse). Traduction française : Classification internationale des handicaps : déficiences, incapacités et désavantages, un manuel de classification des conséquences des maladies, INSERM, CTNERHI, 1988.
42. Pelka F., 1997, The ABC-CLIO companion to the disability rights movement, Santa Barbara, CA, ABC-CLIO.
43. Pfeiffer D., 1998, The ICIDH and the need for its revision, Disability and Society, 13, 503-523.
44. Priestley M., 1998, Constructions and creations: idealism, materialism and disability theory, Disability and Society, 13, 75-94.
45. Priestley M., 1999, Disability politics and community care, London, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
46. Rabeharisoa V., Callon M., 1999, Le pouvoir des malades, l'Association française contre les myopathies et la recherche, Paris, Les Presses de l'École des Mines.
47. Ravaud J.F., 1998, La recherche sur le handicap aux USA : la Society for disability studies. Handicaps et inadaptations, Les cahiers du CTNERHI, 79-80, 225-232.
48. Ravaud J.F., 1999, Modèle individuel, modèle médical, modèle social : la question du sujet, Handicap, Revue de Sciences Humaines et Sociales, 81, 64-75.
49. e partie : Les processus sociaux fondamentaux d'exclusion et d'inclusion, Handicap, Revue de Sciences Humaines et Sociales, 86, 1-18.
50. e partie : Typologie des différents régimes d'exclusion repérables dans le traitement social du handicap, Handicap, Revue de Sciences Humaines et Sociales, 87, 1-17.
51. Rioux M., Bach M., 1994, Disability is not measles: new research paradigms in disability, Ontario, L'Institut Roeher.
52. Shakespeare T., 1993, Disabled people's self-organisation: a new social movement?, Disability, Handicap and Society, 8 (3), 249-264.
53. Shakespeare T., 1998, The disability reader: social science perspectives, London and New York, Cassell.
54. Stiker H.J., 1982, Corps infirmes et sociétés, Paris, Aubier, Réédition Dunod, 1997.
55. Stone E., Priestley M., 1996, Parasites, pawns and partners: disability research and the role of non-disabled researchers, British Journal of Sociology, 47, 699-716.
56. Ustün T.B., Bickenbach J., Badley E., Chatterji S., 1998, A reply to David Pfeiffer « the ICIDH and the need for its revision », Disability and Society, 13, 829-831.
57. Verbrugge L., Jette A., 1994, The disablement process, Social Science and Medicine, 38, 1-14.
58. Vial M., 1990, Les enfants anormaux à l'école. Aux origines de l'éducation spécialisée 1882-1909, Paris, Armand Colin.
59. e siècle, In : Stiker H.J., Vial M., Barral C., Handicap et inadaptation. Fragments pour une histoire : notions et acteurs, Paris, Alter.
60. Westbrook M., Legge V., Pennay M., 1993, Attitudes towards disabilities in a multicultural society, Social Science and Medicine, 36, 615-623.
61. Wieviorka M., et al., 1997, Une société fragmentée ? Le multiculturalisme en débat, Paris, La Découverte.
62. Zarb G., 1992, On the road to Damascus: first steps towards changing the relations of disability research production, Disability, Handicap and Society, 7, 125-138.