The contribution of the higher education sector to Australian research and development

Australian Journal of Education

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 263-283

  Burgio Ficca, Claudia ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Expenditures; Financial support; Higher education; Policy; Research and development; University business relationship

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035649105     PISSN: 00049441     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/000494410104500305     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Australian Bureau of Statistics, (various dates). Research and experimental development, all-sector summary, Australia. (Cat. No. 8112.0). Canberra: AGPS.
2. Australian Bureau of Statistics, (various dates). Research and experimental development, higher education organisations, Australia (Cat. No. 8111.0). Canberra: AGPS.
3. Australian Science and Technology Council. (1987). Improving the research performance of Australia's universities and other higher education institutions. Canberra: AGPS.
4. Baldwin, M.P. (1991). Diversity in the 1990s. Canberra: AGPS.
5. Batterham, R. (2000). The chance to change: Final report by the Chief Scientist. Canberra: Department of Industry, Science and Resources.
6. Bernstein, J. (1988). Costs of production, intra-and inter-industry R&D spillover: Canadian evidence. Canadian Journal of Economics, 21(2), 324-347.
7. Bernstein, J. (1989) .The structure of Canacian inter-industry R&D spillovers, and the rates of return to R&D. Journal of Industrial Economics, 37(3), 315-328
8. Bernstein, J. & Nadiri, M. (1988). Interindustry R&D spillovers, rates of return and production in high-tech industries, American Economic Review, 78(2), 429-434
9. Bernstein, J. & Nadiri, M. (1989). Research and development and intra-industry spillovers: An empirical application of dynamic duality. Review of Economic Studies, 56(2), 249-269.
10. Bureau of Industry Economics. (1992). Economic evaluation of CSIRO industrial research, overview of case studies. Canberra: AGPS.
11. Clark, K.B. & Griliches, Z. (1984) . Productivity growth and R&D at the business level: Results from the PIMS data base. In Z. Griliches (Eds.), R&D, patents and productivity (pp. 393-416). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Coe, D. & Helpman, E. (1995) . International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review, 39(5), 859-887.
13. Coe, D. & Moghadam, R. (1993). Capital and trade as engines of growth in France. IMF Staff Papers, 40(3), 542-566.
14. Committee on the Future of Tertiary Education in Australia (Sir Leslie Martin, Chair). (1964-1965). Tertiary education in Australia: Report (Vois. 1-4). Melbourne: Govt Pr.
15. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation. (1992). Rural research -the pay-off (Occasional Paper No.7). Canberra: Author.
16. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation. (1993). Environmental research - the pay off (Occasional Paper No.8). Canberra: Author.
17. Davies, S. (1989). The Martin Committee and the binary policy of higher education in Australia. Melbourne : Ashwood House.
18. Department of Industry, Science and Resources. (1997). Investing in growth. Canberra: Author.
19. Department of Industry, Science and Resources. (2000). Innovation-unlocking the future: Final report of the Innovation Summit Implementation Group. Canberra: Author.
20. Department of Industry, Science and Resources. (2001). Backing Australia's ability: An innovative action plan for the future. Canberra: Author.
21. Englander, A.S., Evenson, R.E., & Hanazaki, M. (1988). Innovation and the total factor productivity slowdown, OCED. Economic Studies, 11, 7-42.
22. Goto, A. & Suzuki, K. (1989). R&D capital, rate of return on R&D investment and spillover of R&D in Japanese manufacturing industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(4), 555-564.
23. Grains Research and Development Corporation. (1992). Gains for grains (Vols. 1-4). Canberra: Author.
24. Griliches, Z. (1980). R&D and the productivity slowdown. American Economic Review, 70(2), 343-348.
25. Griliches, Z. (1994). Productivity, R&D and the data constraint. American Economic Review, 84(1), 1-23.
26. Griliches, Z. & Lichtenberg, F. (1984). R&D and productivity growth in the industry level: Is there still a relationship? In Z. Griliches (Ed.), R&D, patents and productivity (pp. 465-496). Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
27. Griliches, Z. & Mairesse, J. (1984). Productivity and R&D at the firm level. In Z. Griliches (Ed.), R&D, patents and productivity (pp.339-374). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Gross, R., Kneebone, V., & Luke, R. (1990). Evaluation report: Project evaluations, Victoria's economic strategy for agriculture: Vol. 3. Melbourne: Department of Agriculture and Rural Affairs.
29. Health and Medical Research Strategic Review (P.Wills, Chair). (1999). The virtuous cycle, working together for health and medical research. Canberra: Department of Health & Aged Care.
30. Industries Assistance Commission. (1975). Report on brucellosis and tuberculosis (Report no. 42). Canberra: AGPS.
31. Industry Commission. (1994). Annual Report 1993-94. Canberra: AGPS.
32. Industry Commission. (1995). Research and development (Report No. 44). Canberra: AGPS.
33. Kemp, D. (1999). Knowledge and innovation: A policy statement on research and research training. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
34. Mairesse, J. & Sassenou, M. (1991). R&D and productivity: A survey of econometric studies at the firm level (NBER Working Paper No. 3666). Cambridge. MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
35. Mansfield, E. (1980). Basic research and productivity increases in manufacturing. American Economic Review, 70(5), 863-873.
36. Mansfield, E. (1988). Industrial R&D in Japan and the United States: A comparative study. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 78, 223-228.
37. McLennan Magasanik Pearce Pty Ltd. (1988). Economic evaluation of selected research at the Division of Mineral and Process Engineering. Report prepared for the CSIRO, Division of Mineral and Process Engineering. Melbourne: Author.
38. Mohnen, P. (1990). R&D and productivity growth: A survey of the literature (CERPE - Cahier de Recherche No. 57). Montreal: Université du Quebec à Montreal, Centre de Recherche sur les Politiques Economiques.
39. Mohnen, P. & Lepine, N. (1988). Payments for technology as a factor of production (Cahier n. 8810). Université du Quebec à Montreal, Departement des Sciences Economiques.
40. Mohnen, P. & Lepine, N. (1991). R&D, R&D spillovers and payments for technology: Canadian evidence. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2(1), 213-228.
41. Nadiri, M.I. (1980). Sectoral productivity slowdown. American Economic Review, 70(2), 349-352.
42. Nadiri, M.I. (1993). Innovations and technological spillovers (NBER Working Paper No. 4423). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
43. Odagiri, H. (1985). Research activity, output growth and productivity increases in Japanese manufacturing. Research Policy, 14, 117-130.
44. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (1980). The measurement of scientific technical activities: Proposed standard practice for survey of research and experimental development - Frascati manual. Paris: Author.
45. Parham, D. & Stoeckel, A. (1988). An economic assessment of a program for genetic control of sheep blowfly. Canberra: Centre for International Economics.
46. Scherer, F. M. (1982). Inter-industry technology flows and productivity growth. Review of Economics and Statistics, 64(4), 627-634.
47. Sterlacchini, A. (1989). R&D, innovations and total factor productivity growth in British manufacturing. Applied Economics, 27(11), 549-562.