Control and the Dalkon Shield

Violence Against Women

Volumn 7, Issue 11, 2001, Pages 1303-1317

  Baker, Lisa ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035641314     PISSN: 10778012     EISSN: 15528448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/10778010122183874     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bacigal, R. (1990). The limits of litigation: The Dalkon Shield controversy. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
2. Bartky, S. (1988). Foucault, feminism and the modernization of patriarchal power. In I. Diamond & L. Quinby (Eds.), Feminism and Foucault: Reflections on resistance (pp. 61-87). Boston: Northeastern University Press.
3. Bordo, S. (1989). The body and the reproduction of femininity: A feminist appropriation of Foucault. In A. Jaguar & S. Bordo (Eds.), Gender/body/knowledge: Feminist reconstructions of being and knowing (pp. 13-33). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
4. Corea, G. (1985). How American medicine treats women as patients and professionals. New York: William Morrow.
5. Davis, H. (1970). The Shield intrauterine device. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 106, 455-456.
6. Davis, H. (1971). Intrauterine devices for contraception: The IUD. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
7. Foucault, M. (1976). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.
8. Garland, D. (1990). Punishment and modern society. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
9. Grant, N. (1992). The selling of contraception. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
10. Greenhill, J. P. (1965). Obstetrics. Philadelphia: Saunders. (From the original text by Joseph B. de Lee)
11. Hartmann, B. (1987). Reproductive rights and wrongs: The global politics of population control and contraceptive choice. New York: Harper and Row.
12. Hawkinson v. A. H. Robins Co., Inc., 595 F. Supp. 1290. (1982).
13. Hicks, K. (1994). Surviving the Dalkon Shield IUD. New York: Teachers College Press.
14. Howe, A. (1994). Punish and critique: Towards a feminist analysis of penalty. New York: Routledge.
15. Mintz, M. (1986). At any cost: Corporate greed, women and the Dalkon Shield. New York: Pathenon.
16. Palmer v. A. H. Robins Co., Inc. 684 Pacific Reporter 187.
17. Perry, S., & Dawson, J. (1985). Nightmare: Women and the Dalkon Shield. New York: Macmillan.
18. Robins, A. H. (1971). Who are candidates for the Dalkon Shield? A progress report (Advertisement in medical journals). Los Angeles: Author.
19. Tetuan v. A. H. Robins Co., Inc. 738 Pacific Reporter 1210. (1987).
20. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (1968). Report on intrauterine contraceptive devices. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
21. Worsham v. A. H. Robins Co., Inc. 734 Federal Reporter 676. (1981).