Theory and Contextual Analysis in Sentencing

International Journal of the Sociology of Law

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 253-276

  Henham, Ralph ^a  

^a NOTTINGHAM TRENT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035641251     PISSN: 01946595     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ijsl.2001.0151     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ashworth, A. (1994) The Criminal Process: An Evaluative Study, 1st Edn. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
2. Ashworth, A. (1998) The Criminal Process: An Evaluative Study, 2nd Edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
3. Banakar, R. (2000) Reflections on the methodological issues of the sociology of law. Journal of Law and Society 27, 273-295.
4. Campbell, E. (1999a) Towards a sociological theory of discretion. International Journal of the Sociology of Law 27, 79-101.
5. Campbell, T. (1999b) Human rights: a culture of controversy. Journal of Law and Society 26, 6-26.
6. Carlen, P. (1976) Magistrates' Justice. Martin Robertson: London.
7. Cicourel, A.V. (1968) The Social Organisation of Juvenile Justice. John Wiley: New York.
8. Corbett, C. (1987) Magistrates' and court clerks' sentencing behaviour: an experimental study. In The Psychology of Sentencing. Pennington, D.C. &. Lloyd-Bostock, S. (Eds). Centre for Socio-legal Studies: Oxford, pp. 204-216.
9. Cotterrell, R. (1992) The Sociology of Law: An Introduction. 2nd Edn. Butterworths: London.
10. Cotterrell, R. (1995) Law's Community: Legal Theory in Sociological Perspective. Clarendon Press: Oxford.
11. Cotterrell, R. (1998a) Why must legal ideas be interpreted sociologically? Journal of Law and Society 25, 171-192.
12. Cotterrell, R. (1998b) Law and community: a new relationship in legal theory at the end of the millennium? Current Legal Problems 51, 367-391.
13. Cotterrell, R. (1999) Emile Durkheim: Law in a Moral Domain. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh.
14. Emerson, R.M. (1969) Judging Delinquents. Aldine: Chicago.
15. Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge. Harvester: Brighton.
16. Fuller, L.L. (1969) The Morality of Law, 2nd Edn. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT.
17. Garland, D. (1990) Punishment and Modern Society. Clarendon Press: Oxford.
18. Goffman, E. (1961) Encounters. Bobbs-Merrill: New York.
19. Green, E. (1961) Judicial Attitudes in Sentencing. Macmillan: London.
20. Hart, H.L.A. (1961) The Concept of Law. Clarendon Press: Oxford.
21. Henham, R. (1995) Due process, procedural justice and sentencing policy. International Journal of the Sociology of Law 23, 233-252.
22. Henham, R. (1998) Human rights, due process and sentencing. British Journal of Criminology 38, 592-610.
23. Henham, R. (1999) Theory, rights and sentencing policy. International Journal of the Sociology of Law 27, 167-183.
24. Henham, R. (2000) Problems of theorising sentencing research. International Journal of the Sociology of Law 28, 15-32.
25. Henham, R. (forthcoming) Sentence Discounts and the Criminal Process. Ashgate: Aldershot.
26. Henham, R. & Findlay, M. (2001) Theory and Methodology in the Comparative Contextual Analysis of Trial Process (unpublished discussion paper).
27. Hogarth, J. (1971) Sentencing as a Human Process. University of Toronto Press: Toronto.
28. Hood, R.G. (1972) Sentencing the Motoring Offender. Heinemann: London.
29. Hood, R.G. & Sparks, R.F. (1970) Key Issues in Criminology. Weidenfeld and Nicolson: London.
30. Hudson, B.A. (1987) Justice Through Punishment: A Critique of the 'Justice Model' of Corrections. Macmillan: Basingstoke.
31. Hutton, N. (1995) Sentencing, rationality and computer technology. Journal of Law and Society 22, 549-570.
32. King, M. (1981) The Framework of Criminal Justice. Croom Helm: London.
33. Layder, D. (1994) Understanding Social Theory. Sage: London.
34. Lemon, N.F. & Bond, R. (1987) Some methodological problems in sentencing research. In The Psychology of Sentencing. Pennington, D.C. & Lloyd-Bostock S. (Eds). Centre for Socio-legal Studies. Oxford, 46-54.
35. Llewellyn, K.N. (1960) The Common Law Tradition. Little Brown & Co. Boston: MA.
36. Lovegrove, A. (1989) Judicial Decision-Making: Sentencing Policy and Numerical Guidance. Springer-Verlag: New York.
37. Lovegrove, A. (1997) The Framework of Judicial Sentencing: A Study in Legal Decision-Making. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
38. Mannheim, H., Spencer, J.C. & Lynch, G. (1957) Magisterial policy in the London juvenile courts. British Journal of Delinquency 7, 13.
39. Manning, P.K. (1987) Semiotics and Fieldwork. Sage: Newbury Park, CA.
40. Matza, D. (1964) Delinquency and Drift. John Wiley: New York.
41. Nelken, D. (1998) Blinding insights?: the limits of a reflexive sociology of law. Journal of Law and Society 25, 407-426.
42. Norrie, A. (1996) The limits of justice: finding fault in the criminal law. Modern Law Review 59, 540-556.
43. Parker, H., Sumner, M. & Jarvis, G. (1989) Unmasking the Magistrates. Open University Press: Milton Keynes.
44. Punch, K.F. (1998) Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Sage: London.
45. Rock, P. (1973) Phenomenalism and essentialism in deviancy theory. Sociology 7, 12-129.
46. Rogers, L.J. & Erez, E. (1999) The contextuality of objectivity in sentencing among legal professionals in South Australia. International Journal of the Sociology of Law 27, 267-286.
47. Salter, M. (1996) The impossibility of human rights within a postmodern account of law and justice. Journal of Civil Liberties 1, 29-66.
48. Sanders, A. & Young, R. (2000) Criminal Justice, 2nd Edn. Butterworths: London.
49. Skolnick, J.H. (1966) Justice Without Trial. John Wiley: New York.
50. Sudnow, D. (1965) Normal crimes: sociological features of the penal code in a public defender office. Social Problems 12, 255-276.
51. Tata, C. (1997) Conceptions and representations of the sentencing decision process Journal of Law and Society 24, 395-420.
52. Thomas, D.A. (1979) Principles of Sentencing, 2nd Edn. Heinemann: London.
53. Thomas, D.A. (1982 as updated) Current Sentencing Practice. Sweet and Maxwell: London.