A case management instrument for use in juvenile justice systems

Juvenile and Family Court Journal

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 25-32

  Hoge, Robert D ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035638510     PISSN: 01617109     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-6988.2001.tb00041.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995). Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
2. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1998). The psychology of criminal conduct (2nd ed). Cincinnati, OH:Anderson.
3. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19-52.
4. Andrews, D. A., Robinson, D., & Balla, M. (1986). Risk principle of case classification and the prevention of residential placements: An outcome evaluation of the Share the Parenting Program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 203-207.
5. Andrews, D. A., Robinson, D., & Hoge, R. D. (1984). Manual for the Youth Level of Service Inventory. Ottawa, ON: Department of Psychology, Carleton University.
6. Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
7. Baird, S. C. (1984). Classification of juveniles in corrections: A model systems approach. Washington, DC: Arthur D. Little.
8. Clear, T. R. (1991). Juvenile intensive probation supervision: Theory and rationale. In T. Armstrong (Ed.), Intensive interventions with high-risk youths: Promising approaches to juvenile probation and parole (pp. 29-44). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
9. Costigan, S. (1999). Critical evaluation of the long-term validity of the risk/need assessment and its young offender typology. Unpublished master's thesis, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
10. Costigan, S. M., & Rawana, E. P. (1999, June). Critical evaluation of the long-term validity of the risk/need assessment. Presentation at the Annual Conference of the Canadian Psychological Association, Halifax, NS.
11. Doob, A. N., & Beaulieu, L. A. (1993). Variation in the exercise of judicial discretion with young offenders. In T. O'Reilly-Fleming & B. Clark (Eds.), Youth injustice: Canadian perspectives (pp. 231-248). Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press.
12. Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (1999). What works in young offender treatment: A meta-analysis. Forum on Corrections Research, 11, 21-24.
13. Farrington, D. P. (1997). Early prediction of violent and nonviolent youthful offending. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 5, 51-66.
14. Garb, H. N. (1998). Studying the clinician: Judgment research and psychological assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15. Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. E. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works! Criminology, 34, 401-433.
16. Gottfredson, D. M. (1987). Prediction and classification in criminal justice decision making. In D. M. Gottfredson & M. Tonry (Eds.), Prediction and classification: Criminal justice decision making (pp. 1-20). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17. Gottfredson, M. R., & Gottfredson, D. M. (1988). Decision making in criminal justice: Toward a rational exercise of discretion. New York: Plenum.
18. Grisso, T. (1998). Forensic evaluation of juveniles. Sarasota, FL: Personal Resource Press.
19. Hoge, R. D. (1999a). An expanded role for psychological assessments in juvenile justice systems. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 251-266.
20. Hoge, R. D. (1999b). Assessing adolescents in educational, counseling, and other settings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Hoge, R. D. (2001). The juvenile offender: Theory, research, and applications. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Press.
22. Hoge, R. D., & Andrews, D. A. (1996a). Assessing the youthful offender: Issues and techniques. New York: Plenum.
23. Hoge, R. D., & Andrews, D. A. (1996b, August). Assessing risk and need factors in the youthful offender. Presentation at the Annual Conference of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, ON.
24. Jung, S. (1996). Critical evaluation of the validity of the risk/need assessment with Aboriginal young offenders in northwestern Ontario. Unpublished master's thesis, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
25. Jung, S., & Rawana, E. P. (1999). Risk-need assessment of juvenile offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 69-89.
26. Le Blanc, M. (1998). Screening of serious and violent juvenile offenders: Identification, classification, and prediction. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 167-193). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Lindsey, A. J. (2000). Psychopathy, risk/need factors, and psychiatric symptoms in high-risk youth: Relationships between variables and their link to recidivism. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
28. Lipsey, M. W. (1995). What do we learn from 400 research studies on the effectiveness of treatment with juvenile delinquents? In J. McGuire (Ed.), What works: Reducing reoffending (pp. 63-78). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
29. Lipsey, M. W., & Derzon, J. H. (1998). Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86-105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1998). Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders: A synthesis of research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 313-345). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Loeber, R., & Dishion, T. J. (1983). Early predictors of male delinquency: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 68-99.
32. Minor, K. I., Hartmann, D. J., & Terry, S. (1997). Predictors of juvenile court actions and recidivism. Crime and Delinquency, 43, 328-344.
33. Poluchowicz, S., Jung, S., & Rawana, E. P. (2000, June). The interrater reliability of the Ministry Risk/Need Assessment Form for juvenile offenders. Presentation at the Annual Conference of the Canadian Psychological Association, Ottawa, ON.
34. Quinsey, V., Harris, G., Rice, M., & Cormier, C. (1998). Violent offenders: Assessing and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
35. Sanborn, J. B. (1996). Factors perceived to affect delinquent dispositions in juvenile court: Putting the sentencing decision into context. Crime and Delinquency, 42, 99-113.
36. Schissel, B. (1993). Social dimensions of Canadian youth justice. Toronto, ON: Oxford.
37. Shields, I. W., & Simourd, D. J. (1991). Predicting predatory behavior in a population of young offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 18, 180-194.
38. Simourd, L., Hoge, R. D., & Andrews, D. A. (1991, June). The Youth Level of Service Inventory: An examination of the development of a risk/needs instrument. Presentation at the Annual Conference of the Canadian Psychological Association, Calgary.
39. Simourd, D. J., Hoge, R. D., Andrews, D. A., & Leschied, A. W. (1994). An empirically-based typology of young offenders. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 447-461.
40. Tate, D. C., Reppucci, N. D., & Mulvey, E. P. (1995). Violent juvenile delinquents: Treatment effectiveness and implications for future action. American Psychologist, 50, 777-781.
41. Towberman, D. B. (1992). National survey of juvenile needs assessment. Crime and Delinquency, 38, 230-238.
42. Wiebush, R. G., Baird, C., Krisberg, B., & Onek, D. (1995). Risk assessment and classification for serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders. In J. C. Howell, B. F. Krisberg, J. D. Hawkins, & J. J. Wilson (Eds.), A sourcebook: Serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders. (pp. 171-212). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.