Human factors in business-to-business research over the internet

International Journal of Market Research

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 425-440

  Brown, Joseph ^a   Culkin, Nigel ^a   Fletcher, Jonathan ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035637691     PISSN: 14707853     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adriaenssens, C. & Cadman, L. (1999) An adaptation of Moderated E-mail Focus Groups to assess the potential for a new online (internet) financial services offer in the UK. Journal of the Market Research Society, 41, 4, pp. 417-424.
2. Bechar-Israeli, H. (1998) From 〈Bonehead〉 to 〈Clonehead〉: nicknames, identity and play on internet Relay Chat. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication.
3. Boston Consulting Group (BCG) (2000) URL:http://www.bcg.com/new_ideas/new_ideas_subpage8.asp.
4. Brookes, R. (Ed.) (2000) Market Research in a .com Environment. ESOMAR Monograph No. 10. Amsterdam: ESOMAR.
5. Cane, A. (2001) Delays send shivers: viewpoint: third-generation phone services. Financial Times, 16 May.
6. Cattell, L. (2001) The mobile internet revolution and its implications for research. ESOMAR Worldwide Internet Conference, Net Effects 4, 11-13 February, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 191-212.
7. Clarke, K. (2000) Business-to-business research. Research among business people and professionals. In L.T. Wright & M. Crimp (Eds), The Marketing Research Process (5th edn). Harlow: Pearson Education.
8. Comley, P. (2000) Moderated e-mail groups. International Journal of Market Research, 42, 1, pp. 111-112.
9. Dexter, A., Brown, A. & Smith, D.V.L. (2000) No matches found - the hidden personality of the Internet User. ESOMAR Congress, 17-20 September, Vienna, Austria.
10. Dommeyer, C.J. & Moriarty, E. (2000) Comparing two forms of an e-mail survey: embedded vs. attached. International Journal of Market Research, 42, 1, pp. 39-50.
11. Eichman, C., Segger, E., Mezzasalma, A. & Licastro, G. (2001) Values added from internet research: enhanced usefulness, methodological innovation and global partnership. ESOMAR Worldwide Internet Conference, Net Effects 4, 11-13 February, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 43-60.
12. Flood, V. (2000) Brand building in the age of e-commerce: have the 'rules' changed? The Market Research Society Conference Papers, MRS, London, pp. 437-446.
13. Griffiths, M. (1997) Does internet and computer addiction exist? Some case study evidence. The American Psychological Association Conference, 15 August 1997, Chicago, USA.
14. Johnson, J. (2001) INSIDE TRACK: wrong call on France's 3G auction. Financial Times, 30 May.
15. Johnston, A. (1999) Welcome to the wired world. Research, 402, pp. 22-25.
16. Kent, R. & Lee, M. (1999) Using the internet for market research: a study of private trading on the internet. Journal of the Market Research Society, 41, 4, pp. 377-385.
17. Mehta, R. & Sivadas, E. (1995) Comparing response rates and response content in mail versus electronic mail surveys. Journal of the Market Research Society, 37, 4, pp. 429-439.
18. Miller, J. (2000) Net v phone: the great debate. Research, 411, pp. 26-27.
19. Montgomery, E. (2001) Getting a response. Research, 420, May, pp. 32-33.
20. Moore, A.G. (1991) Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling High-Tech Products to Mainstream Customers. New York: HarperCollins.
21. Noble, I., Moon, N. & McVey, D. (1998) 'Bringing it all back home' - using RDD telephone methods for large-scale social policy and opinion research in the UK. Journal of the Market Research Society, 40, 2, pp. 93-120.
22. Nordén, J. & Johansson, J. (2001) Faster, cheaper, better. Wireless dialogue at every point of sale. ESOMAR Worldwide Internet Conference, Net Effects 4, 11-13 February, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 229-240.
23. Ozer, M. (1999) The use of internet-based groupware in new product forecasting. Journal of the Market Research Society, 41, 4, pp. 425-438.
24. Partridge, K. & Kamer, A. (2001) Speed, power and efficiency: the impact of wireless technology on internet research. ESOMAR Worldwide Internet Conference, Net Effects 4, 11-13 February, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 213-227.
25. Pincott, G. & Branthwaite, A. (2000) Nothing new under the sun? The Market Research Society Conference Papers, MRS, London, pp. 359-370.
26. Poynter, R. (2001) Exciting new conjoint options, via the web. ESOMAR Worldwide Internet Conference, Net Effects 4, 11-13 February, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 31-44.
27. Sanders, M.R. (2001) Global eCommerce Approaches Hypergrowth. Forrester Research Briefing Document, 18 April, Cambridge, USA.
28. Sheehan, K.B. & Hoy, M.G. (1997) E-mail surveys: patterns, process and potential. Academy of American Advertising Conference, 6 April, St Louis, USA.
29. Schillewaert, N., Langerak, F. & Duhamel, T. (1998) Non-probability sampling for WWW surveys: a comparison of methods. Journal of the Market Research Society, 40, 4, pp. 307-322.
30. Smilowitz, M., Compton, D.C. & Flint, L. (1988) The effects of computer mediated communication on an individual's judgement: a study based on the methods of Asch's social influence experiment. Computers in Human Behaviour, 4, pp. 311-321.
31. Smith, C. (1997) Casting the net: surveying an internet population. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3, 1. Also at http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue1/smith.html.
32. Taylor, H. (2000) Does internet research work? Comparing online survey results with telephone survey. International Journal of Market Research, 42, 1, pp. 51-63.
33. Willke, J., Adams, C.O. & Girnius, Z. (1999) Internet testing. A landmark study of the differences between mall intercept and on-line interviewing in the United States. ESOMAR Worldwide Internet Conference, Net Effects, 21-23 February, London.
34. Willke, J., Lundy, S. & Mustard, D. (2000) Burning Out Internet Respondents. Avoiding the Mistakes of the Past. Net Effects 3, ESOMAR Publication Series, Vol. 237.
35. Young, K.S. (1998) Caught in the Net. New York: John Wiley & Sons.