Cognitive dissonance and post-decision attitude change in six presidential elections

Political Psychology

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 521-540

  Beasley, Ryan K ^a   Joslyn, Mark R ^b  

^a BAKER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitude change; Dissonance; Elections; Survey

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035627941     PISSN: 0162895X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0162-895X.00252     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abelson, R., Kinder, D. R., Peters, M. D., & Fiske, S. T. (1982). Affective and semantic components in political person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 619-630.
2. Anderson, C. J., & Guillory, C. A. (1997). Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems. American Political Science Review, 91, 166-181.
3. Bartels, L. M. (1996). Uninformed votes: Information effects in presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 194-230.
4. Bass, L., & Thomas, D. (1980). Dissonance and perception during a presidential campaign: Pre-and post-election findings from the Carter-Ford contest. Journal of Social Psychology, 112, 305-306.
5. Biddle, B. J., Pinkerton, J. K., & Petty, R. E. (1988). Subject population, thought modality, and cognitive dissonance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 9, 213-230.
6. Brehm, J. (1956). Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 384-389.
7. Brehm, J. W., & Cohen, A. R. (1962). Explorations in cognitive dissonance. New York: Wiley.
8. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Campbell, D. T., & Kenny, D. A. (1999). Primer on regression artifacts. Guilford Publications, Incorporated.
10. Cigler, A. J., & Getter, R. (1977). Conflict reduction in the post-election period: A test of the depolarization thesis. Western Political Quarterly, 30, 363-376.
11. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues of field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
12. Cooper, J., & Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 229-266.
13. Cooper, J., & Mackie, D. (1983). Cognitive dissonance in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 536-544.
14. Dalton, R. J., & Wattenberg, M. P. (1993). The not so simple act of voting. In A. W. Finifter (Ed.), Political science: The state of the discipline II (pp. 193-218). Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
15. Edelman, M. (1964). The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
16. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17. Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18. Finkel, S. E. (1995). Causal Analysis with panel data. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
19. Frenkel, O. J., & Doob, A. N. (1976). Post-decision dissonance at the polling booth. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 8, 347-350.
20. Ginsberg, B. (1982). The consequences of consent: Elections, citizen control and popular acquiescence. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
21. Ginsberg, B., & Weissberg, R. (1978). Elections and the mobilization of popular support. American Journal of Political Science, 22, 31-55.
22. Granberg, D., & Brent, E. (1983). When prophecy bends: The preference-expectation link in U.S. presidential elections, 1952-1980. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 477-491.
23. Granberg, D., & Nanneman, T. (1986). Attitude change in an electoral context as a function of expectations not being fulfilled. Political Psychology, 7, 753-765.
24. Greenwald, H. J. (1969). Dissonance and relative versus absolute attractiveness of decision alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 328-333.
25. Harmon-Jones, E., & Mills, J. (1999). Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26. Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 21, 107-112.
27. Key, V. O., Jr. (1961). Public opinion and American democracy. New York: Knopf.
28. Knox, R. E., & Inskter, J. A. (1968). Post-decision dissonance at post time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 319-323.
29. Nadeau, R., & Blais, A. (1993). Accepting the election outcome: The effect of participation on losers' consent. British Journal of Political Science, 23, 553-563.
30. Nimmo, D., & Savage, R. (1976). Candidates and their images. Concepts, Methods, and Findings. Goodyear Publishing Co., Inc.
31. Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1997). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 609-647.
32. Price, V., & Zaller, J. (1993). Who gets the news? Alternative measures of news reception and their impact for research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 133-164.
33. Regan, D. T., & Kilduff, M. (1988). Optimism about elections: Dissonance reduction at the ballot box. Political Psychology, 9, 101-107.
34. Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind: Investigations into the nature of belief systems and personality systems. New York: Basic Books.
35. Scher, S., & Cooper, J. (1989). Motivational basis of dissonance: The singular role of behavioral consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 899-906.
36. Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1996). Questions & answers in attitude surveys. Experiments on question form, wording, and context. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Shultz, T. R., Leveille, E., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Free choice and cognitive dissonance revisited: Choosing "lesser evils" versus "greater goods." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 40-48.
38. Silber, B. D., Anderson, B. A., & Abramson, P. R. (1986). Who overreports voting? American Political Science Review, 80, 613-624.
39. Simon, L., Greenberg, J., & Brehm, J. (1995). Trivialization: The forgotten mode of dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 247-260.
40. Stricker, G. (1964). The operation of cognitive dissonance on pre-and post-election attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 63, 111-119.
41. Thomsen, A. (1938). What voters think of candidates before and after election. Public Opinion Quarterly, April, 269-273.
42. Walster, W. G., & Walster, E. (1970). Choice between negative alternatives: Dissonance reduction or regret? Psychological Reports, 26, 995-1005.
43. White, G. L., & Gerard, H. B. (1981). Postdecisional evaluation of choice alternatives as a function of valence of alternatives choice and expected delay of choice consequences. Journal of Research in Personality, 15, 371-382.
44. Zaller, J. R. (1985). Pre-testing information items on the 1986 NES pilot survey (report to the National Election Study Board of Overseers). Available: http://www.umich.edu/nes/.
45. Zippel, B. (1980). Change in attitude of party switchers before and after and election. Psychological Reports, 46, 919-923.