A communication model of conceptual innovation in science

Communication Theory

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 290-314

  White, William J ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035627211     PISSN: 10503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00244.x     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Archer, M. S. (1988). Culture and agency: The place of culture in social theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Ashmore, M. (1989). The reflexive thesis: Wrighting sociology of scientific knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bloor, D. (1991). Knowledge and social imagery (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Routledge.
6. Brown, R. A. (1980). Science and the creative imagination. Speculations in Science and Technology, 3, 563-572.
7. Callon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (1986). How to study the force of science. In M. Callon, J. Law, & A. Rip (Eds.), Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world (pp. 3-15). London: Macmillan.
8. Cole, S. (1992). Making science: Between nature and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Collins, R. (1998). The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
10. Deetz, S. A. (1994). Future of the discipline: The challenges, the research, and the social contribution. In S. A. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook 17 (pp. 565-600). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Foucault, M. (1994). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage Books.
12. Fuchs, S. (1996). The new wars of truth: Conflicts over science studies as differential modes of observation. Social Science Information, 35, 307-326.
13. Fuller, S. (1988). Social epistemology. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
14. Garvey, W. D. (1979). Communication: The essence of science. New York: Pergamon Press.
15. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analyses. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
16. Gieryn, T. F., & Figert, A. E. (1986). Scientists protect their cognitive authority: The status degradation ceremony of Sir Cyril Burt. In G. Bohme & N. Stehr (Eds.), The knowledge society (pp. 67-86). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
17. Goerner, S. J. (1995). Chaos, evolution, and deep ecology. In R. Robertson & A. Combs (Eds.), Chaos theory in psychology and the life sciences (pp. 17-38). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the evolution of society (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
19. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 1. Reason and the rationalization of society (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
20. Holton, G. (1986). The advancement of science, and its burdens. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Horgan, J. (1996). The end of science: Facing the limits of knowledge in the twilight of the scientific age. New York: Broadway Books.
22. Kelso, J. (1980). Science and the rhetoric of reality. Central States Speech Journal, 31, 17-29.
23. Kovacic, B., MacDougall, R. C., & Cushman, D. P. (1996). Prying open the window of opportunity: Some rhetorical and social scientific dynamics to argumentation. Communication Theory, 6, 361-373.
24. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge [Bedford College International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science], pp. 91-196.
26. Lakatos, I. (1971). History of science and its rational reconstructions. In R. C. Buck & R. S. Cohen (Eds.), PSA 1970: In memory of Rudolf Carnap [Boston studies in the philosophy of science, vol. 8], pp. 91-135.
27. Langley, P., & Jones, R. (1988). A computational model of scientific insight. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 177-201). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern (C. Porter, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Latour, B. (1996). Aramis, or the love of technology (C. Porter, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Laudan, L. (1981). The pseudo-science of science? Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, 173-198.
32. Lievrouw, L. A. (1988). Four programs of research in scientific communication. Knowledge in Society, 1(2), 6-22.
33. Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
34. Martin, E. (1998). Anthropology and the cultural study of science. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 23, 24-44.
35. Merton, R. K. (1973). Science and technology in a democratic order. In R. K. Merton, The sociology of science (N. Storer [Ed.]; pp. 267-278). Chicago: University of Illinois Press. (Original work published 1942)
36. Mulkay, M. (1991). Three models of scientific development. In M. Mulkay, Sociology of science: A sociological pilgrimage (pp. 51-61). Bloomington: University of Indiana Press. (Original work published 1975)
37. Mulkay, M. (1991). Action and belief or scientific discourse? In M. Mulkay, Sociology of science: A sociological pilgrimage (pp. 14-20). Bloomington: University of Indiana Press. (Original work published 1981)
38. Mulkay, M., & Edge, D. O. (1976). Cognitive, technical, and social factors in the growth of radio astronomy. In G. Lemaine, R. MacLeod, M. Mulkay, & P. Weingart (Eds.), Perspectives on the emergence of scientific disciplines (pp. 153-186). Chicago: Aldine. (Original work published 1973)
39. Mulkay, M., & Gilbert, G. N. (1991). Opening Pandora's box: A case for developing a new approach to the sociological analysis of theory-choice in science. In M. Mulkay, Sociology of science: A sociological pilgrimage (pp. 131-153). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Original work published 1984)
40. Nola, R. (1991). Ordinary human inference as refutation of the strong programme. Social Studies of Science, 21, 107-129.
41. Perry, C. A. (1996). Scholarly communication in developmental dyslexia: Network influences on change in a hybrid problem area (Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, 1996). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57-02, A0491.
42. Perry, C. A., & Rice, R. E. (1998). Scholarly communication in developmental dyslexia: Influence of network structure on change in a hybrid problem area. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(2), 151-168.
43. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44. Pinch, T. J. (1997). Kuhn - The conservative and radical interpretations: Are some Mertonians "Kuhnians" and some Kuhnians "Mertonians"? Social Studies of Science, 27, 465-482. (Original work published 1982)
45. Popper, K. R. (1981). The rationality of scientific revolutions. In I. Hacking (Ed.), Scientific revolutions (pp. 80-106). London, UK: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1975)
46. Prelli, L. (1989). A rhetoric of science: Inventing scientific discourse. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
47. Schnabel, J. (1994). Puck in the laboratory: The construction and deconstruction of hoaxlike deception in science. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 19, 459-492.
48. Schwartz, J. (1992). The creative moment: How science made itself alien to modern culture. New York: HarperCollins.
49. Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1-29.
50. Shepherd, G. J. (1993). Building a discipline of communication, Journal of Communication, 43(3), 83-91.
51. Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures and the scientific revolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52. Taylor, C. A. (1996). Defining science: A rhetoric of demarcation. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
53. Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding (Vol. 1). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55. Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56. Weinberg, S. (1993). Dreams of a final theory. New York: Pantheon Books.
57. Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Knopf.